Talk:Prism (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fair use rationale for Image:Prism-Armageddon.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Prism-Armageddon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


This use should not be editing this article as he has a clear WP:COI as noted here on his userpage. Any edits that include large additions should be under scrutiny. ScarianCall me Pat! 15:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

COI clarification please: Although I do understand the premise of the COI guidelines, I fail to see how this can be productive with information accuracy. I'm willing to learn but I also hope this can make sense... My attempt to update the inaccuracies of the history and update current information regarding the band were removed because of my intimate knowledge of the band it would seem. Would that connection not likely provide the most accurate information possible? In addition, my changes were not editorial but were quoted directly from a document on the Prism website. (btw, my changes on my personal page were made to attempt to clarify that my knowledge was real. At the time, I didn't realize that would be a problem in my contribution) Jpenner (talk) 18:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
It's not that it might not be accuracte (We aim for verifibility not truth), it's just that you might have a bias/slant in your work that would conflict with our neutrality policy. I'm friends with a couple of prominant writers who have their own articles on Wikipedia, but I never touch them because I know them and I might, consciously or unconsciously, give a bias to the article. ScarianCall me Pat! 18:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)R

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prism (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)