Talk:Privacy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidatePrivacy is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 24, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article candidate

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 1 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GoBears243. Peer reviewers: Yzhang7, Miawach.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

7[edit]

Mayar Hesuaf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.39.230.176 (talk) 22:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Automated surveillance[edit]

With the explosion of automated surveillance technologies, I think it's appropriate to include more information of them in the context of privacy and their privacy implications: face recognition, ALPR, video summarization of numerous cameras pointed at public spaces, extensive data collection, data matching from different databases, big data analysis with artificial intelligence methods, etc. 2A0D:6FC0:B53:600:C48C:743C:7C50:7925 (talk) 18:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Globalize the History section[edit]

I have just moved the "Internet" section out of the "History" section, as it necessarily involves a more global viewpoint, but the History section is painfully US-centric and gives the impression that privacy itself is a US or Western concept, which is untrue but is often invoked by many entities as a form of propaganda to dissuade people from caring about privacy. To be clear, it would be extremely useful to expand the Internet section with more sources about non-US incidents, but I think it would be most helpful to expand the History section with descriptions of how classical conceptions of privacy have run into the more modern interpretations of privacy around the globe. Lcdrovers (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Privacy is misused by corrupt independent sources to CENSOR public figures.[edit]

Privacy is misused by corrupt independent sources to CENSOR public figures. Please include this fact in the article. 24.5.197.126 (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please provide a reliable source for your claim. JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (correct me if I'm wrong) 19:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]