Talk:Proceedings of SPIE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Academic Journals (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.
WikiProject Physics / Publications  (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by Publications Taskforce.
 

The journal (or even proceeding) should be mentioned with a stub, not only with a link[edit]

In the most of cases, the reader look for a paper, not for SPIE. The shorter is chain of links, the better. dima 04:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Please confirm classification[edit]

The WikiProject classification for Proceedings of SPIE is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set |class=Stub on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  18:48, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Stub. @Tom.Reding:. If you think it looks like a stub (see WP:JCW), just update the talk page, or just leave a message on the talk page. Removing the stub template + leaving a talk page message for others to re-add the stub template and update the talk page templates is tedious. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
@Headbomb: I will do that for the most obvious cases (like this one).   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  19:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)