From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleProtein has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
December 23, 2005Good article nomineeListed
November 6, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
November 3, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
April 26, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

lead too long Tag[edit]

I have tagged the article with a lead too long tag. My edit conforms to WP:LEADLENGTH and should not be reverted without providing a good reason. Also, at the time the article got promoted to GA‐status, the lead was shorter then it is now. —MartinZ02 (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

What do you think should be removed from the Lead? Graham Beards (talk) 20:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Of the 5 current paragraphs : perhaps para 5 be deleted/moved to the related section, and para 3 be moved into its own new section on protein lifecycle/degradation ? - Rod57 (talk) 23:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Should explain what a secreted protein is[edit]

Other WP articles refer to secreted protein but this article does not explain what that is. eg. Is it all except structural proteins and transmembrane proteins ? Could have a Classification section ? - Rod57 (talk) 22:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Should list protein size, in molecular weight as well as amino acids[edit]

Biology is aided by numeracy, yet many protein pages contain no information on protein size. What would it take to include the molecular weight (in daltons) and number of amino acids in the summary boxes for individual proteins? Or a range, for protein families? Newbie editor here, so apologies if this isn't the right venue for such an question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Protein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)