Talk:Purple-necked rock-wallaby

Mammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Purple-necked rock-wallaby is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Purple Kangaroo Software

A google search for this company shows only wikipedia links. Am I missing something, or should the reference be deleted? Electrolite 20:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reference to delete. Those are apparently obsolete results.

Coyoty 23:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Purple-necked Rock-wallaby vs. Purple Kangaroo

Could someone direct me to a reference that says that the Purple-necked Rock-wallaby is definitely associated with or ever called the Purple Kangaroo? I've never heard that, and since the Purple Kangaroo information has nothing to do with the marsupial I think that it should have its own page. Frickeg 05:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]