From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

I found the QB64 linked off of the qbasic page. I found it informative, interesting, and noteworthy as it is the only "port" of qbasic to a modern operating system that I've heard of. I don't think that there is any reason that this article should be removed. AlfredR (talk)


It doesn't even have a project page. -> delete (talk) 08:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


I've seen this happen before....over-enthusiastic fans of a project will prematurely make a Wikipedia article before the project has matured enough to be notable. The article then gets deleted and it's reputation on Wikipedia gets forever tarnished, unlikely to ever come back when the project is further along. The "QB64" people here, who seem to have a good project going, should have waited a while longer before writing an article. PLEASE keep for now and wait for it to mature. (talk) 06:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

youre kidding right??? this may be one of the best languages ever made and you think it shouldnt be on wikipedia just because a bunch of lame stream programmers havent noticed it yet? lol whatever — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majorheadrush (talkcontribs) 09:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)


I downloaded QB64 myself and the license of the last version is LGPL 2.1. The article doesn't seem that well written. I will change the license and other stuff that isn't right as a start. --Stijn Brouwer (talk) 14:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)