Talk:Quagmire's Dad/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 17:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am reviewing this article and have made some mostly minor copy edits, including adding a bit more information to the lead to round it out. If you would prefer to add different information or reword what I put in the lead, please do.
Otherwise, the article is well written and fulfills the GA criteria.
Xtzou (Talk) 17:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
- Looks fine to me. Gage (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
Clearly and concisely written.
- B. MoS compliance:
Complies with required elements of MOS
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
Reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
Sets the context
- B. Focused:
Remains focused on the topic
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! A very nice article. Xtzou (Talk) 22:52, 31 May 2010 (UTC)