Talk:Radar Men from the Moon

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Plot P.O.V.[edit]

Plot Summary seems needlessly negative. I know Republic got pretty low-budget by the end, but this should be noted, and the editorializing cut out.BoosterBronze (talk) 17:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Differing chapter titles[edit]

Chapters 7 and 12 each list two different titles, per two different cited books on serials. Note that near the bottom of the page is a set of Ext. links for each title. These go to online videos of the serial. Checking the endings of Chs. 6 and 11 and the openings of 7 and 12 reveals that Jack Mathis' work got both right. It might be argued that William D. Cline obtained his titles from studio records, but the fact remains that what went up on screen was the studio's final decision, and is therefore more official than any considered but ultimately rejected title found on documents that don't happen to indicate the rejection; the fact that something else is on-screen proves that this happened. To call this "original research" would constitute prohibiting taking any credits for a film or TV production off the screen, which is no more "original research" on our part than taking them out of a book or magazine article about the production under discussion (which in fact is second hand and subject to error as is exactly what happened with Cline here). No difference: we read the information somewhere credible, write it down and add it to the article. I move we remove Cline's titles and the identifications of both books. --Ted Watson (talk) 22:33, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commando Cody Vs The Moon Menace?[edit]

It's hard to find info on this Series. Is this the same as "Commando Cody Vs The Moon Menace?"

albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally Known as Al Gordon 22:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Radar Men from the Moon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]