Talk:Radiation proctitis

Medicine: Gastroenterology / Radiology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Gastroenterology task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Radiology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Radiation proctitis.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Can[edit]

Can someone to check whether this article's content is one of the following:

Extracted from US federal government work. (If so, then no problem, since US gov't created publications are uncopyrightable)
Extracted from another source (copyvio).
Original or condensed from other sources.

D.valued 02:15, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the reference that I included at the bottom of the page if you have any questions about the content of the article. This article is tied to the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Collaboration of the Week project prostate cancer. It is prose constructed entirely by me based upon my knowledge and understanding of the disease with a reference at the bottom for any factual support needed. I am removing the unverified tag (I've never seen it used for a referenced article, I must say!) InvictaHOG 02:50, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]