Talk:Radioactive waste
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Radioactive waste article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
| Archives: 1, 2 | |||
| This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Archives |
|---|
|
|
| Threads older than 150 days may be archived by MiszaBot I. |
Contents
Cost of Storing Radioactive Waste Through Staff[edit]
If we take some of the models of storing radioactive waste at 10,000, 100,000 or 1 million years.
I was just wondering if there was a security personnel and there wage were say from the year 2000 as a baseline say a salary $10,000 per year.
What would the salary be of that person doing that job in 10,000, 100,000 or 1 million years time be?
I believe it would take more than one person to maintain such a facility to hold radioactive waste.
This is just a simple question on economics.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Supertoaster2 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 16 June 2009
Misrepresentation of source[edit]
In the section "Geologic disposal": "Aside from dilution, chemically toxic stable elements in some waste such as arsenic remain toxic for up to billions of years or indefinitely.[58]"
- The source mentions arsenic in the context of long-term waste problems from carcinogenic elements from the buried wastes produced by non-nuclear methods of generating electricity ! The point being that while we worry about the danger of nuclear waste, these dangers dissapear with time, unlike those of non-nuclear carcinogens in the waste produced by fossile fuel plants. Ssscienccce (talk) 18:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
I might edit this a bit, in part because of misuse of words, using radioisotopes, rather than radionuclides. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graemem56 (talk • contribs) 12:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Specifically, 11C & 14C are radio-isotopes, 12 & C13C are non-radioactive isotopes. But 14C, 40K & 90Sr are not radio-isotopes for the same reason that 12C, 41K & 88Sr are not isotopes. 14C, 40K & 90Sr are radio-nuclides.Graemem56 (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Proliferation[edit]
In addition to plutonium-239, which is highly suitable for building nuclear weapons, it contains large amounts of undesirable contaminants: plutonium-240, plutonium-241, and plutonium-238. Pu240 has a high spontaneous fission rate, which complicates weapons design. Pu238 is an alpha emitter, I don't see SF specified. Does Pu241 also have a high SF rate? Gah4 (talk) 14:36, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Radioactive waste. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/rev26-34/text/colmain.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Radioactive waste. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://analysis.nuclearenergyinsider.com/operations-maintenance/recycling-spent-nuclear-fuel-ultimate-solution-us
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605190619/http://www.law.berkeley.edu/centers/ilr/ona/pages/dumping2.htm to http://www.law.berkeley.edu/centers/ilr/ona/pages/dumping2.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scientiapress.com/findings/r%26r.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/mragheb/www/NPRE%20402%20ME%20405%20Nuclear%20Power%20Engineering/Thorium%20Resources%20in%20%20Rare%20Earth%20Elements.pdf - Corrected formatting/usage for http://ecosun.org/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515112707/http://www.iaea.org/inis/ws/subjects/nuclear_facilities.html to http://www.iaea.org/inis/ws/subjects/nuclear_facilities.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Radioactive waste. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513121013/http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2115 to http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2115
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216224243/http://www.cppa.utah.edu/publications/environment/nuclear_waste_summary.pdf to http://www.cppa.utah.edu/publications/environment/nuclear_waste_summary.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- B-Class Environment articles
- High-importance Environment articles
- B-Class glass articles
- B-Class glass articles of Mid-importance
- Mid-importance glass articles
- WikiProject Glass articles
- C-Class physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance physics articles
- C-Class Engineering articles
- Low-importance Engineering articles
- WikiProject Engineering articles