|WikiProject Languages||(Rated C-class)|
Reworked Article for Neutrality
Reworked article to give neutral view rather than the claim that Etruscan position is proven.
For "mainstream opinion" see current Encyclopedia Britannica online:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/489428/Raetian-language —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 07:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Could use actual info on language
The article of course could use a table showing the phonology of Raetic, and a description of grammatical structure, with comparisons to Etruscan, Celtic, Venetic/Illyrian, Latin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 08:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Why on earth does Venetic alphabet link to this article???!!! It has little to do with the subject. I'm about to change it to the Old Italic alphabet.--Pet'usek [petrdothrubisatgmaildotcom] 08:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)