Talk:Rajendra Persaud

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Raj Persaud)
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography / Science and Academia (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Psychology (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 


Untitled[edit]

Does anybody know how / why allusions to the incident of alleged plagiarism, according to this page's history, have been deleted in the recent past? (preceding unsigned comment by 81.155.178.65 at 06:27, 19 November 2005)

Maybe because of the vindictiveness involved. The Guardian has been hounding Raj for a long time now —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.105 (talkcontribs) , at 21:17, 2 January 2006

This biographical sketch does not do justice to Raj Persaud's tremendous reputation, contributions and following. There seems to be an organised and persistent attempt to discredit Raj. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.105 (talkcontribs) , at 22:23, 18 December 2005

I think we can now all agree that Raj managed to discredit Raj. 86.133.48.32 (talk) 16:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Latest press reports indicate that the panel set up by King's College has reported the allegations were of a nature that could be dealt with at departmental level i.e at the Institute of Psychiatry without the need for a formal enquiry. The Institute has decide that no further action is required and closed the matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.72 (talkcontribs) , at 23:12, 12 April 2006

Can we have a citation for that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulWicks (talkcontribs) , at 10:01, 13 April 2006

I have removed the quotes from Private Eye as it is satire not fact.128.86.151.46 (talk) 22:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad someone else has already reverted your edits, User talk:128.86.151.46. Private Eye has a fine history of investigative journalism, and has broken or helped to break many stories in the past, including the Profumo Affair and others. Just because you don't like what it says doesn't make it any the less true: Persaud has a long and repeated history of plagiarism, which he has tried to blame on others (sub-editors and the like) while failing to take full responsibility for his actions. 86.152.22.234 (talk) 15:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Raj Persaud[edit]

Raj Persaud has indeed resumed presenting the BBC Radio 4 programme "All in the Mind". I heard this evening's (Tuesday 10th April 9-9.30 p.m.), which he presented, and the trailer for next week indicates he will again be the presenter for that edition.Judy Skelton 21:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Anyone else who can confirm this? --Tilman 04:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Heard him today. But aurely this is not controversial -- a glance at the All in the Mind website is all it takes. Flapdragon 16:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Bringing the website is all that was needed. Thanks. --Tilman 17:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


Raj Persaud - plagiarism[edit]

In response to requests for citations, and the suggestion that Persaud's 'alleged' (subsequently confessed to the UK General Medical Council) plagiarism might have more to do with the media than with Persaud's practice of plagiarism, following are some citations from the UK broadsheet press, the BBC and Reuters:

"TV doctor Raj Persaud faces disciplinary panel on plagiarism charges" (The Times, June 16, 2008) http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4147576.ece

"TV psychiatrist Raj Persaud admits he copied work from books" (The Times, June 17, 2008) http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article4153530.ece

"TV psychiatrist Raj Persaud suspended for plagiarism" (The Times, June 21, 2008) http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4179597.ece

"Raj Persaud: TV psychiatrist admits plagiarism" (The Guardian, June 16, 2008) http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/jun/16/mentalhealth.health?gusrc=rss&feed=society

"Media psychiatrist fights for his job" (The Guardian, June 17, 2008) http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/jun/17/mentalhealth.health

"Persaud's blatant cribs were flabbergasting, professor tells tribunal" (The Guardian, June 18, 2008) http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/jun/18/mentalhealth.health

"Persaud's plagiarism was dishonesty, rules medical council" (The Guardian, June 19, 2008) http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/jun/19/mentalhealth.health

"Persaud suspended from practice for three months over plagiarism" (The Guardian, June 21, 2008) http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/jun/21/mentalhealth.health

"TV doctor Raj Persaud admits plagiarism" (The Independent, 16 June, 2008) http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-news/tv-doctor-raj-persaud-admits-plagiarism-848184.html

"Raj Persaud found guilty of 'dishonest plagiarism'" (The Independent, 20 June, 2008) http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-news/raj-persaud-found-guilty-of-dishonest-plagiarism-851027.html

"Dr Raj Persaud: General Medical Council says fitness to practise impaired" (The Telegraph, 20 Jun, 2008) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2163359/Dr-Raj-Persaud-General-Medical-Council-says-fitness-to-practise-impaired.html

"Dr Raj Persaud: from populist psychiatrist to plagiarist" (The Telegraph, 20 Jun, 2008) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2164236/Dr-Raj-Persaud-from-populist-psychiatrist-to-plagiarist.html

"TV psychiatrist found guilty of disrepute" (Reuters, Jun 19, 2008) http://uk.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUKL1981217520080619?sp=true

"Media doctor guilty of disrepute" (BBC, 19 June, 2008) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7464210.stm

"Media psychiatrist Professor Raj Persaud has admitted to the General Medical Council that he plagiarised articles from other academics." (BBC, 16 June, 2008) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7457091.stm

"Media doctor hit with suspension" (BBC, 20 June, 2008) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7465539.stm


Link Suggestion[edit]

Raj Persaud has recently given a public lecture (from a church pulpit, of all places!) which, as well as being very well presented, entertaining and thought-provoking, is perhaps his first public performance after the plagiarism scandal. It can be watched online here: http://www.gresham.ac.uk/event.asp?PageId=45&EventId=800 and would make for an interesting external link I would think. (I only don't put it up myself as there is a possible conflict-of-interest as I am connected with Gresham College, who hosted the lecture). Jamesfranklingresham (talk) 17:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm puzzled by this one. I can see why it would be good for Persaud. But I would have thought this sort of thing would only bring Gresham into disrepute. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 06:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rajendra Persaud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)