|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Recycling symbol article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|WikiProject Environment||(Rated Start-class)|
- Well, that displays as a blank rectangle on my computer... AnonMoos (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
The logo displayed in the entry is different from that referenced at the American Forest & Paper Association page. Examine the arrow in the lower left corner. On the existing Wiki page the arrow turns "away" from the viewer. On the AFPA site (and other sources) the bottom left arrow turns "towards the viewer. Which is correct? Both? Curious minds eagerly await resolution.(talk) 09:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Recycling symbol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928100102/http://www.afandpa.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Environment_and_Recycling/Recycling/Recycling_Resources/GaryAndersonFound.pdf to http://www.afandpa.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Environment_and_Recycling/Recycling/Recycling_Resources/GaryAndersonFound.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.
Removal of well-referenced and relevant content
@22.214.171.124 Do not remove content that is well-referenced just because it is "obvious" to you personally. Other readers may still appreciate knowing what seems so obvious to you, or may want to know if their surmises about the reasons for something are actually supported by the facts. If you are not interested in the factual content, just go somewhere else. Reify-tech (talk) 11:48, 28 March 2017 (UTC)