Talk:Regenbald/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: maclean (talk) 05:13, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- One image - WPCommons hosted Creative Commons image.
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Looks good. I don't see any problems here. maclean (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: