Talk:Reinhard Scheer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Reinhard Scheer has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 3, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
June 18, 2010 WikiProject peer review Reviewed
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Reinhard Scheer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

On first reading, before I get to the formal evaluation, this looks like an excellent article that I will have no trouble approving. There is only one oversight that should be corrected: Several citations refer to "Tarrant," but it is not identified in the bibliography. Reviewer: PKKloeppel (talk) 22:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for catching that, I added the full reference to the bibliography. Parsecboy (talk) 02:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Formal evaluation: The article is

1. Well-written:
(a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct: yes
(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections and layout: yes
2. Factually accurate and verifiable:
(a) it provides references to all sources of information: yes
(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations: yes
(c) it contains no original research: yes
3. Broad in its coverage:
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic: yes
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail: yes
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias: yes
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: yes
6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: yes
(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: yes

Summary: The article meets all the criteria for a Wikipedia Good Article. Passed. PKKloeppel (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)