Talk:Relational art

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Contemporary Art    (Inactive)
WikiProject icon This article was within the scope of WikiProject Contemporary Art, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
 
WikiProject Visual arts (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 

[Untitled][edit]

I would claim that Relational aestethetics and thus relational art is a 1990s thingy and not 2000.--Norskkunstpåwiki (talk) 07:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Article title[edit]

I've restored the title to the original. This is an art term and is the common name for the term. We do use the English term as a rule if the English term is the preferred one, which it is in this case. freshacconci talktalk 15:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Again, the original title of the article is Relational Art. This article is about the art movement not the book. The art movement is based on the book but the article title should reflect the article subject not the source of the title. Can other editors please discuss moves before attempting them? Only non-controversial moves should take place without discussion. This is hardly non-controversial as we'd have to go through a number of articles and change art --> aesthetics if we changed the article title, as "relational art" is the common name. freshacconci talktalk 15:33, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Freshacconci, the Bourriaud original title does not mention the word "Art", hence article title should properly be "Relational Asthetics," and not "Relational Art." As you have it at the moment, i.e., "Relation Art" probably needs an extra "al" at the end--it suggests aunts and uncles, no? Artiquities (talk) 07:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move to Relational art.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:22, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


Relation ArtRelational Art — "Relation Art" has no specific currency, "Relational Art" is the best bet here, no? Or, even better, "Relational Aesthetics." --Artiquities (talk) 10:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

OK. I just noticed that. That is my fault. That really should be Relational, not Relation. In the end, Relational Art is preferred to Aesthetics as the article is about the art movement not the book. freshacconci talktalk 16:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
This has been moved around so much I think we'll need an admin to sort it out so we get all the histories merged properly. freshacconci talktalk 16:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry for one of the moves, as I was trying to move the page back to Relational Aesthetics but it didn't work. I believe the best name is Relational Aesthetics since the book carries the name. What do you guys think? GuzonjinSin (talk) 03:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment. Whatever it's renamed to, it should be "art" and not "Art". -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
I've thought about it and I think Freshacconci is right, it should be art and not aeshtetics to avoid confusion between the movement and the book. And indeed, it should be art with a lowercase a. GuzonjinSin (talk) 09:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Relational art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Relational art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)