Talk:Resurrection of the Daleks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Doctor Who (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Television / Episode coverage (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborate effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the episode coverage task force.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

"Erroneous" companion omissions[edit]

Did the production team actually say that Kamelion and the second K-9 were accidental omissions? Leela was, but Kamelion had barely been in more than one story and they may well have decided that showing two slightly different K-9s would be silly. Are we using erroneous in the sense that they meant to include a companion and forgot (as with Leela), or in the more POV sense that we think those should have been there but they weren't? --Whouk (talk) 23:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Episode breaks[edit]

I have added the 'long' episode break. Is there any way to use a dotted line to show where 'short' episodes 1 & 3 ended? --Jawr256 09:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure that's possible. I added a note to show where the four-part breaks were designed to go, but not sure if that's entirely successful. --khaosworks (talkcontribs) 09:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
We could try something like this:

Whouk (talk) 15:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Good idea --Jawr256 07:01, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Just to complicate things even further an early edit of the four part version was sold overseas, minus music & sound effects on some episodes but also with an additional scene in the short part two and the cliffhanger not at the point where Stein reveals he's a Dalek agent but a few seconds later as the Daleks surround the Doctor. But I think the BBC Video & DVD releases use what is the "final" version before the compliation was made. Timrollpickering 09:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Special Guests[edit]

As this was before leslie grantham became famous, does he really count as a special guest? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.111.211 (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Body Count[edit]

Firstly I can't find any media reports on the body count being notably high. Secondly The Terminator has an on-screen body count of 28.[1] Thus unless someone can rustle up some media or other noteworthy analysis of what constitutes a high body count (40-odd humans lasered or shot with magic bullets that produce no blood is more note-worthy than some other count somewhere else...?) then I propose this section regarding The Terminator be deleted, and we leave the reference in the production notes section that gives the accurate body count. Finally I find this body count thing quite irrelevent, I don't see Star Wars being critisied for entire planets being blown up on screen, yet 20-odd Daleks is notable? ;-) --Ant (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/trivia