Talk:Revolution Software/GA2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 7arazred (talk · contribs) 21:39, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead adequately summarises the article, see WP:LEAD
    The prose good, it is "reasonably well written".
    It's well organised, information is presented logically. Please read WP:MoS and subpages.
  2. It is accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    stable

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Shoddily put together, please read the good article criteria and make sure that this article meetrs them before renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This artcile has not been reviewed. 7arazred simply copied and pasted Talk:Revolution Software/GA1 altering the failure points to passes. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Seconding the above just for the record. Apparently nominated by Bsbass, though I cannot see how this is any short of socking given 7arazred created this page 10 min later. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 14:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)