Talk:Richie Rich (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 01:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Move Ri¢hie Ri¢h to Richie Rich (film). Per naming conventions, article titles are based on English usage, not corporate logos or advertising fonts.


Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
  • Support as nom. Kafziel Talk 17:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support I agree. I see no reason for any exceptions here. -- 20:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support seems cut-and-dried. --Groggy Dice T|C 08:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support --Yath 14:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose Movie is credited as "Ri¢hie Ri¢h", this does not go against WP:UE. See I ♥ Huckabees or How to Beat the High Co$t of Living.--Húsönd 21:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Changed to Strong Oppose. Richie Rich already contains the article about the comics and there's no need to merge the articles.--Húsönd 00:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
      • The new location will be Richie Rich (film), not Richie Rich. This isn't a merge proposal, it's a move proposal. Kafziel Talk 12:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
        • Oh, right. Back to regular Oppose then.--Húsönd 13:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
          • Once again I change my stance, this time to neutral, as per Patstuart's argument.--Húsönd 20:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support per above and the fact that no one is going to type Ri¢hie Ri¢h into the search bar to find this. 00:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
    • For the record, that's why we have redirects.--Húsönd 00:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support - the closest we can get from WP:NC is under the band section: Do not replicate stylized typography in logos and album art, though a redirect may be appropriate (for example, KoЯn redirects to Korn (band)). Also see Toys "Я" Us redirecting to Toys "R" Us - sorry Husond :( Patstuarttalk|edits 19:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support The Rich family are not multi-trillionaires. It's clearly stated in the beginning parts of the movie that they are multi-billionaires. Please do not change it to multi-trillionaires, as that's not correct. (talk) 17:47, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Surnames of females[edit]

Would anyone know where the surname Pazinski comes from? The end credits only say "Gloria" and "Diana". Were the surnames referenced within the film? I had thought Gloria to be Gloria Glad, for example.

Does Diane give her full name to Cadbury at some point? If so, even if she were named Pazinski, I don't think her being Gloria's mother would necessarily mean that Gloria shares her surname, as children may have the surname of the father (perhaps a Mr. Glad) meaning that she may not be Gloria Pazinski.

Would like to know the source, if anyone happens to have a clip of the name being said (or referenced outside the film?) or if they could name the time within the film the surname Pazinski is used. Ranze (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)