Talk:Roberts Field

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roberts Field article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the airport project.

Oregon C‑class Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

rdm serves central oregon, not just redmond[edit]

I know the info is contained in a form- but it provides wrong info... the form says "closest city" when you edit, but when it displays, it displays "city served" in this case, if data was looked at by numbers of pop. served or geographical area served, it would not be redmond. redmond is only the closest, not biggest or most important to make a long story short, why does someone revert my edits when I try to clarify this? is it because the form says "closest" and not something else? Because basically it is wrong info you are putting out there. 66.220.110.152 02:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I have returned to article to reflect Redmond as City Served. First, Central Oregon is not a city. Second, under the same rational all airports located in Central Oregon should have their "city served" changed to Central Oregon instead of the communities they provide service to. Finally, the info box reflects the FAA 5010 Form. Please feel free to move this discussion to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports for further clarification or consensus on how this box shall be used. --Trashbag 17:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

a- your link doesn't work b- yes all public passenger airports which have a wiki entry in Central Oregon should be changed. However there is only one- RDM. c- so you think DTW should be changed to "serving" Romulus, Michigan??? Thats silly and you know it. By pop., RDM serves Bend, Oregon foremost among numerous cities. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.220.110.152 (talk) 01:32, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

ps- go look at the IAH entry. It has the exact same setup as I am proposing (city served-greater houston), so I don't see much legs under the literal use of "city served". Also I changed the main template so "Serves" is connected to "primary city or area served" which apparently the users in Houston willl accept at least. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.220.110.152 (talk) 01:58, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

Source[edit]

Expansion info Aboutmovies (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Roberts Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Roberts Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

horizon vs alaska, etc[edit]

why are we going to use the regional affiliate name in the table, but only for some airlines? how is that npov? 67.204.153.57 (talk) 16:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roberts Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120927084535/http://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/npias/reports/media/2011/npias_2011_appA.pdf to http://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/npias/reports/media/2011/npias_2011_appA.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]