Talk:Robinson Crusoe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Novels (Rated C-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Fictional characters (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

WP:SUBTITLES[edit]

I'm trying to get some comments for a proposed guideline about titles with subtitles. I would appreciate any comments over at WP:Village pump (policy)/Archive 16#WP:SUBTITLES. Thanks! superlusertc 2007 December 23, 08:37 (UTC)

another possible source[edit]

In the spanish article, you can read that a possible source to the novel is the real story of Pedro Serrano, a castaway who lived during 4 years in a desert island. In his travels to spain, DeFoe could have heared or read about his story. And if you read the Comments that Garcilaso de la Vega "El Inca" wrote about the story of Pedro Serrano, you can see parallel facts between the novel and the real story, for example when Robinson believes that the Devil is in the island.

Silly tags[edit]

Just in case someone objects to the "detagging" of the lead to this article - we probably DO need a good cite for the fact that Más a Tierra was renamed as "Robinson Crusoe Island" in 1966 (although a quick check reveals this is actually true) - without going into silly detail, we don't need the citations that I deleted, for things that are quite verifiable, if not plainly obvious. Although the referencing (and perhaps some other factors) preclude this from being more than a c-class article at present, and two sub-sections are (rightly) taged as being short on references, it probably doesn't need an overarching "references needed" tag. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 04:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

omission of the Robinson Crusoe movie starring Pierce Brosnan created in 1996[edit]

24.49.8.245 (talk) 05:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

No, not "omitted" at all - please read the article before making remarks like this. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 06:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Cleanup needed as of 9/16[edit]

Reading through this article I became very annoyed at the redundant and repetitive theories of who and what was the real inspiration for the tale. These are located in many sections throughout the article, sometimes repeated word-for-word (especially that of Alexander Selkirk). They should only be listed in the intro and under 'Sources', the latter of which should also probably be merged with the 'Real-life Castaways' section. While I could do this on my own, I'd rather someone a bit more qualified handle it for quality reasons. Mousenight (talk) 06:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Extra-plot matter in synopsis[edit]

A thoughtful editor removed some matter from the synopsis section that I have reinstated - although the edit was in good faith. General remarks about modern fiction do not really apply here - RC was written at a time when "realistic" prose fiction (at least in English) was very new indeed - and the book actually purports to be factual, and is to a large degree based on real events, so generalisations appropriate to modern fiction do not really apply.

On the other hand, several editors have expressed dissatisfaction with the general layout of the article - could it be improved perhaps with a general reorganisation - including perhaps a separation of the retelling of the basic story and commentary? --Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

The section I edited has the specific purpose of summarizing the plot, not calling out any real events that (supposedly) inspired it. Furthermore, the claims that I removed are not cited to sources where those claims appear. As such, they appear to be original research and it is legitimate to remove them as such. 24.7.14.87 (talk) 23:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
No worries - just thought we needed to clarify just why the changes were being made. The whole article is a bit of a muddle really when I come to re-read it. Just redo the change - remark on the edit summary that this is "following discussion on talk" or words to that effect. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 23:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)