This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Wikipedia is not a strategy guide or instruction manual. Wikipedia articles should focus on the games themselves, not on how to play them; they should not contain tips, tricks, or cheat codes. That information is available elsewhere (such as on our sister project, Wikibooks), in printed guides and online, and does not belong in an encyclopedia entry. Please do not add your own hints or opinions of the game.Verifiable content about the history, design, and overall description of the game is welcome. If you have questions about whether specific information should be added, ask here first.
Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. jd22292(Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 14:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
This has been deleted twice by a new user and must not be taken down the description of it: On June 22, 2017 Roblox Introduced Portrait Mode & Dynamic Thumbstick for only Mobile devices. For now the only popular games to use it are Natural Disaster Survival and MeepCity but it would be available for other games soon.Mathew James Hall (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Only if there's a WP:RS to back the claim. There are various tools here on Wiki you can use to find sources. jd22292(Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Re Third opinion request: At this point I there's not been enough discussion to even identify what the actual dispute might be, much less thorough discussion of that dispute as required by 3O (and all other moderated content dispute resolution processes here). I've removed (i.e. declined) the 3O request for that reason. It can be refiled or some other DR process used if discussion begins and, once thoroughly discussed, comes to a standstill. Just a note in passing about general principles: A self published source such as a company's website can be a RS for things about the company, such as the existence of a feature such as this. But whether it should be included in an article means that the information cannot be given undue weight, "Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources". That generally requires some RS outside the company to illustrate that the information is significant beyond its mere existence. To merely presume from the nature of the feature that it is significant is a form of prohibited original research, you really need some third-party sources talking about it. (And before someone asks, does that mean that some stuff that's already in the article shouldn't be there? I can't say that I've really looked, but that's entirely possible in this kind of article. But the remedy to that situation is to remove the improper stuff, not just to add more.) Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 17:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Not done — No specific edit requested, no edit history to indicate what might be desired. — TransporterMan (TALK) 16:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Will we be adding Roblox myths and creepypastas?
Hi guys I was just asking if anyone knows if Wikepidia already has a Roblox creepypastas and myths that has been spread around Roblox such as Guest 666,John Doe and Jane Doe and the COmunity???If there is not such a discussion should I add it to Wikepidia??? Kazok1000 (talk) 11:13, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
The only way we can include them in this article is if they're reliably sourced. As in, covered by third-party websites. jd22292(Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, fan content like that isn't inherently notable - it needs to be covered in reliable, third-party sources for us to write about it. You can find a list of reliable sources that often write about video games at WP:VG/RS.--IDVtalk 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
The short version is no, "creepypastas" are not generally the the type of thing an encyclopedia would cover, no. Please do not add this to the article.Sergecross73msg me 18:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)