This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
why isnt there anyhting here or on milliken's page about the darlington case. It was from when milliken shut down a plant in darlington SC that tried to unionize in 1956. The workers went to eh NLRB about it and eventually won under the idea that it was unfair labor practices. Milliken appealed to the supreme court and lost again. Ultimately the company had to pay $5 million in back bay and hire everyone back, but not before milliken tied of the case for 20 years or so and 1/5 of the workers involved had already died. it is pretty important in the scheme of things, because he managed to keep the company non-union, and probably helped inspire the same sort of practices out of Sam Walton and Wal-Mart. this article reads like a love letter. textile workers union V. Darlington manufacturing— Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 00:38, 11 November 2011 (UTC)