Talk:Roman Republic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Roman Republic has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
December 12, 2005 Good article nominee Listed
August 9, 2006 Good article reassessment Delisted
June 22, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
Current status: Good article
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Roman Republic:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

The arts section[edit]

There seems to be a bit of a problem here with chronology. This article is supposed to be on the Republic (509-27 BC), but the author mentions writers such as Juvenal and Persius, who wrote later.

Education and Language[edit]

I noticed that the Education and Language section somewhat meanders off topic. At one point it begins talking about how Vulgar Latin gradually transformed into the Romance languages, and then tacks on an explanation on the origin of English. While all of this is interesting, I'm not sure if it fits within the scope of the article. Didn't the romance languages not come along until after the fall of the empire? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 06:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Plebeian Council vs Plebeian tribunal[edit]

I see references to these two things that look suspiciously like they're talking about the same body. Can someone clarify this please? Fresheneesz (talk) 09:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Not sure where you're reading "Plebeian Tribunal" in this article; there's "Tribunate", of course (many times over), meaning the appointment or office of "Tribune" as elected representative of the Plebeian Council. Haploidavey (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, can you provide a link? There's no such thing as the plebeian tribunal. - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 17:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Suggestion: Re-write[edit]

Like a lot of articles on the Roman state, this one could use a good overhaul. Even if only the intro were redone, that would be a great help. - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Source on the Twelve Tables?[edit]

I'm not sure the source for citation 206 is valid. The site it links to, Crystalinks, lists itself as the personal blog of a psychic, and provides no sources for their quotes of the Twelve Tables.

Could we perhaps link instead to the sources listed on the Twelve tables wikipedia page? New Wikipedian here so i'm unsure of the protocol — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natswash (talkcontribs) 23:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Section on the republic's founding?[edit]

I propose there should be one. Comments? Suggestions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by InformationvsInjustice (talkcontribs) 05:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)