Talk:Rowena Webster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Rowena Webster has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 19, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 2, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Australian Stingers Ashleigh Southern, Glencora Ralph, Zoe Arancini, Rowena Webster and Nicola Zagame are five of seventeen water polo players trying to make the 2012 Summer Olympics squad?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rowena Webster/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 19:51, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Review[edit]

Criteria[edit]

Review[edit]

  1. Well written:
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) No problems. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) No problems. Pass Pass
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) No problems. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) No problems. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No problems.' Pass Pass
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) No problems. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) No problems. Pass Pass
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
    Notes Result
    No problems. Pass Pass
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    Notes Result
    No problems. Pass Pass
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) No problems. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) No problems. Pass Pass

Result[edit]

Result Notes
Pass Pass Looks good.

Discussion[edit]

No real problems jump out at me. Still not sure why the weight is included, but then again I am not particularly well versed in water polo. No issues with quotes or any weird readings, so I'm going to pass this. Its very textbook like. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:52, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Additional Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
  2. ^ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
  3. ^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
  4. ^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
  5. ^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
  6. ^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rowena Webster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC)