Talk:Rudbeckia hirta

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horticulture and Gardening Mid‑importance

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Height[edit]

how tall do blackeye susans get —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.8.160.238 (talk) 00:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some new photos[edit]

I recently uploaded some new photos of Rudbeckia hirta, below. I realise there are already many photos of this flower, but feel free to use if useful. Dcoetzee 19:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"It is an upright annual (sometimes biennial or perennial)..."[edit]

If one is going to say "sometimes" something, an explanation should be given of when and/or under what conditions the "sometimes" happens. Is it for different varieties, different parts of the country, random chance? Help us out here.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.40.203.249 (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2010‎

It is a perennial in its native range.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 20:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To make this truly encyclopedic...[edit]

There is a lot of science here and that's fine. What isn't here is the edible parts. This is very dangerous! Warning people that some parts are inedible but not explaining is a dangerous practice. People will eat parts of it, believing it's probably okay. That's just the way it is. I'm a nurse, and am very familiar with this type of thing. It is better to either remove the remarks about it being edible at all, which I do not recommend since it is encyclopedic information, or simply list what parts are edible. If one isn't sure, then it really shouldn't be addressed at all in the article. MagnoliaSouth ^(talk) 19:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed the sources ive seen claim no part of the plant is edible, though also not toxic. 90.247.227.132 (talk) 15:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]