This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
The last sentence in the article says Brice is the subject of a controversy but does not explain what it is. The source cited is an anonymously-authored website article which contains derogatory material. Is there any reason why this sentence should not be deleted?Lacewing 01:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
I deleted it. No one has stated why it should remain and looking at the article cited, it is entirely an opinion piece that is not grounded in any factual reality. 188.8.131.52 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I agree that the controversial material should remain. Explorer's Web is likely the most indepth and trustworthy exploration and adventure news source available. It should also be mentioned that Brice is part of the heat regarding the shootings of Tibetans on Nagpa La late last year. He was against the release of the information and video and actually treated the Chinese soldiers for snowblindness not long after the shootings and was outraged at Luis Benitez, the man who finally had the courage to take the story public. Here's a source: http://www.bass-schuler.com/Riders/MensJournal_Nov07_MURDER19K.pdf. --Bentonia School (talk) 04:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Both of these mentioned situations are discussed in the May 2008 issue of Outside Magazine. It should be noted that the web site Explorers Wed has had very little if any input from Mr. Brice. Also I believe their attitude toward him is somewhat hostile. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 09:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
And rightfully so. He is a controversial figure in the mountaineering world. By not allowing this information to be listed in Wikipedia shows the lack of balls of most people who use this "information" source. --Bentonia School (talk) 20:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)