Talk:Russian battleship Poltava (1911)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Russian battleship Poltava (1911) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star Russian battleship Poltava (1911) is part of the Gangut class battleships series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
October 4, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
October 17, 2010 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian battleship Poltava (1911)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Second opinion requested.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Checking for edit warring.

Reviewer: WikiCopter (radiosortiesimagesshot down) 22:51, 4 October 2010 (UTC) Comment the link to Gangut is a dablink. Can you address that? WikiCopter (radiosortiesimagesshot down) 22:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Edit wars?! Hardly anyone's edited the article in months.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Sturm. What seems to resemble an edit war. The other contributor, Jo0de, was working in tandem with Sturm. Nothing else seems to pop up as anythign close to an EW. Buggie111 (talk) 23:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)