Talk:Ruth Barrett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ruth Barrett/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs to be recreated as a separate article. Badbilltucker 17:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 17:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Removing notability tag[edit]

With Ruth having published articles in peer reviewed journals multiple times that have been directly responded to by dozens of times, having her work and ideas forming a significant part of a book by KS Coleman that directly talks about Ruth's life experences, mentions her full name 20+ times as both a source of information and about life details related to Ruth, having some details of her life included in both a Thomsan-Gale encyclopedia regarding LGBT topcs and a separate encyclopedia about Wiccan and Neopagan traditions, as well as many other articles, including book reviews, there's no question that she passes both WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. It took me less than two minutes to dig up that list, I'm sure there are more, and that was with no special access to journals etc engaged. User:Kevin Gorman | talk page 04:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

If you believe that she meets GNG, please add sources and/or sourced material to the article. SPECIFICO talk 13:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)