|WikiProject Trains / in Japan / Monorail||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
Disadvantages of JR-Maglev
- By all means, find a reliable source for that assertion, and add it to the article. Tim PF (talk) 07:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
So, the term "JR-Maglev" isn't a thing. Nowhere in JR Central's English literature is the system referred to as anything but the SCMAGLEV (all caps) or the Superconducting Maglev. See: SCMAGLEV and Railway Park (http://museum.jr-central.co.jp/en/), references to the system in their Data Books (http://english.jr-central.co.jp/company/company/others/data-book/). The only place that the term JR-Maglev is used is on Wikipedia and unofficial blogs and such that are referencing this page.
I can confirm this as a representative of a firm working directly with JR Central in the U.S. We are told to use the term 'SCMAGLEV' in all marketing materials. The disconnect on Wikipedia has caused quite a bit of confusion.
I created a page for 'SCMAGLEV' and redirected it to this page for the time being, but unless there is objection, I plan to swap the names, so that JR-Maglev redirects to 'SCMAGLEV' instead, and "SCMAGLEV" becomes the focus of the article. --Pdovak (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with your comments about the apparently fictional "JR-Maglev" name, and have gone ahead and boldly moved the article to "SCMaglev". Note that the stylistic "SCMAGLEV" in all-caps is a non-starter on Wikipedia, as it contravenes our manual of style guidelines at WP:MOSCAPS and WP:MOSTM, even if JR Central likes to write it as "SCMAGLEV". --DAJF (talk) 01:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Should there not be at least a small reference to the crash caused by WJR's cultural obsession with speed of service? This article feels a little like a corporate puff-piece on tech progress, with no historical or cultural context. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 09:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)