Talk:SS Empire Miniver

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article SS Empire Miniver has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
September 25, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:SS Empire Miniver/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Good job on these two articles. The same issues can be seen on both. For one, I would like to see the prose referenced. Also, I would like to see a stub made on both shipbuilding companies. Other than that, these articles look in much better shape than the one that you rushed previously. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 17:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Also, keep this in mind: Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 200 tons, use 200 tons, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 200 tons. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 17:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
The lead is not cited per WP:LEADCITE. Quantities and units generated by {{convert}} have the non-breaking space inserted automatically. For others, I don't use the  , but instead a keyboard entered hard space " " (option + space bar on a Mac). — Bellhalla (talk) 20:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SS Empire Miniver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:51, 23 January 2016 (UTC)