Talk:Salman Khan/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


No advertising[edit]

Why Salman is not referred as a Superstar when the whole of India knows that Salman Khan is one of the biggest superstar of the Indian Film Industry.This has been proved when the newspaper,magazines,journalists and other medium has always referred to him as Superstar.This has been proved by his astounding success and his very unique and successful run at the box office.The things which support this is the magazines,articles,Journals and news channels and the film industry people who have always referred to him as superstar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidds83 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's NOT OK to use an actor's appearance in ads for that product to advertise that product. Zora 05:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan hosting a new show[edit]

Salman Khan is hosting Dus Ka Dum on Sony Entertainment Television why haven't u guys added that information with the source for shah rukh khan u all can add new information but why not for salman khan.A R Ansari —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.75.229 (talk) 11:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky's revert[edit]

Lucky, I know that some Indians dislike the term Bollywood, but it is widely used in India and the West. It will definitely be the most familiar term for Westerners. (Bollywood is considered "cool" now.) Salman Khan appears in Bollywood films, not in Tamil or Telugu or Bengali films, and that's important enough to say in the first para. First para for other Bollywood actors contains the word Bollywood.

As for your reversion of the section headings -- the accepted style for Wikipedia titles (articles, sections, sub-sections) is an initial cap and no caps after that (unless title is a proper name). You restored headings that broke the style guidelines. Zora 06:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Zora's revert[edit]

Adhishb 05:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Zora, Bollywood, still remains an Informal Term, even according to Wikipedia [1][reply]

Yes, it's slang, just like "Oscars" is slang for Academy Awards. That doesn't mean that it isn't the main term used. Zora 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further, your suggestion that the Term Bollywood is included in the Introductory section of the Actors is not entirely correct, prominent Actors Amitabh Bachchan and Shahrukh Khan are also termed as Indian Actors, their Work Place comes later as Mumbai (Hindi/Urdu)Film Industry.

If someone has removed Bollywood, it needs to be added. Zora 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That Bollywood is considered Cool is a personal opinion and an Indian Perspective, it is a derogatory term from the West's point of view.

Dude, I'm not Indian. I'm a Westerner. I grew up on the west coast of the US and I live in Honolulu now. I read the New York Times every single day and they use BOLLYWOOD. It is not a derogatory term. Zora 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actors these days are a part of a Global Village, their introduction by large should be understandable to every part of the globe.

The Term Bollywood is still Alien to many Audiences, the first impression sounds exactly like Tollywood, Kollywood and Lollywood for example.

One must always strive for a genuine Identity.

Bollywood IS the Western identity. Too much so -- the other regional industries are often ignored. I suppose I'm as guilty as most, as I know little of Indian films outside Mumbai. Zora 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan's debut Hollywood film is about to be released, which will then classify him as an International Star, tomorrow he or others may step into Mainstream Hollywood films, for that matter even in a South Indian Film, so how will you then classify them as appears in Bollywood films alone?

No, look at the article for Amrish Puri. He appeared in films from many different industries, including Hollywood, and it is so noted there. Zora 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Therefore the classification has to be an Indian Actor working in Hindi Film Industry, Mumbai, popularly known as Bollywood, Or Telugu Film Industry etc.

It is quite understood that an Indian Actor will be working in the Indian Film Industry as a whole and not in the Bangladeshi Film Industry for instance.

Therefore it is inappropriate to include it in the introductory term.

No one is eliminating the informal name Bollywood completely, a detailed description about Bollywood can be read in the Career section to determine Salman Khan's appearence in Hindi Cinema and not in South Indian Cinema for instance.

To chop off the fact about Salman Khan was voted as the 7th Most Good Looking Man by the People's Magazine, U.S. accounts is totally unreasonable.

Every dang film or celebrity magazine runs polls, and if we noted them on actors' profiles we'd run out of room. This is ephemera. It doesn't count. The rest of us who edit Bollywood articles are deleting the polls whenever we see them. They don't mean a thing. Zora 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He is Dating An actress denotes Present tense, it does not mean he is dating someone in the past. Therfore the use of He is currently dating doesnot make much sense.

It's a nuance. It makes it clear that as of this writing, he is dating her. It may be out of date tomorrow. Zora 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that Salman Khan endorses a few products, does not advertise the manufacturer extensively, it's only a mere mention of the name of the products for news value.

Actors are endorsing products right and left, and advertisers are using that as a hook to get their products into Wikipedia. We delete advertising wherever we see it. Otherwise this encyclopedia would be overrun with advertising. I spend half my time removing linkspam. There is NO NEWS VALUE in product endorsements. Actors shill, they get paid. This is not newsworthy. Zora 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestions for Headlines were incorporated.

Best Regards ~LuckyS~

You know that your use of caps is ungrammatical and highly idiosyncratic? Zora 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First go back and learn basic spellings and grammar, before preaching your first world hypocricy. Wikipedia is not the domain of self styled editors like you.

Keep your Vandalism off bay! ~LuckyS~

Cruise was on the People Magazine list thrice - Khan once. Given the rest of Cruise' list, don't you think there's a slight difference between Khan & Cruise? --Plumcouch Talk2Me 13:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salman's ethnicity[edit]

I've read that Salman Khan's mum Salma Khan is a Marathi who convreted to Islam after marriage. Atleast its a common knowledge in Maharashtra. Could somebody possibly check this assertion? If it is backed up with sources then perhaps we can include it in the article. File:England flag large.png अमेय आर्यन DaBroodey 08:04, 2. Rama's arrow 02:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Sorry, I didn't know that Helen was his "step-mom." Rama's arrow 03:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helen isnt his mother, shes got nothing to do with salman khan. Salmans mom is Salma Khan

Fixed article again[edit]

This is an encyclopedia, not a film magazine. I have toned down the language and fixed the erratic capitalization. Zora 07:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed article yet again[edit]

Someone had rewritten the account of the car crash in a tortured and convoluted way that seemed to blame the car and not the driver. Since Salman was given special treatment by the police, and not tested for blood alchohol, we'll never know if this "loss of control" was due to drunkenness; however, that remains an open question as far as many people are concerned. I rewrote to leave the question of responsibility open.

Someone also rewrote with lots of caps, incomplete sentences, and lavish use of hyperbole and bold lettering. Look, this is an encyclopedia, not a film column. Categorizing movies as flops and blockbusters is just too informal -- there's no real definition for either. Zora 22:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of the article yet again by User Zora[edit]

  • Do you know anything about the case? First go educate yourself about the subject before twisting the facts to suit your propaganda.
  • Salman Khan wasn't given any special treatment by the Police! If it was the case, then prove it, give us sources to back your claim!
  • He was tested for blood alcohol, if he wasn't, show us a report to prove your point.
  • If he was that much drunk to drive negligently, that he/ his car didn't lose control, it wouldn't have waited to reach that far, it would have collided at a point much before the Bakery.

There is no proof that it was him who was driving. The matter is sub-judice, it shouldn't be speculated in this Encyclopedia in the first place.

  • Salman Khan has been proven Not Guilty By the Courts for Vehicular Homicide. If you know what it means.

Sources- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3076990.stm

http://www.bollywoodmantra.com/1238_witness-turns-hostile-in-salman-khans-hit-and-run-case.html

http://www.apunkachoice.com/happenings/20050805-0.html

  • Unless you are a jealous and insecure fan, in the guise of a neutral user of one of his Rival actors such as SRK. This seems most certainly the case with you. A film magazine will still have some truth to their story, while all you make is assumptions with no facts to prove your points.
  • You need to check any other article in Wikipedia, if you are pretending to be oblivious of the facts that Caps are used in abundance in every article to indicate/ highlight the importance of a word.
  • Blockbuster is an encyclopedic word. There is, as much a difference between an All Time Blockbuster and a Hit film as there is between a Cat and a Cow.

Unless you don't know the meaning or are jealous/refusing to accept the facts.

  • Unless you are the Biggest Ignorant on Wikipedia, you didn't even realise that the word Blockbuster was in Bold and interlinked to its entry in Wikipedia itself.
  • And what is your obsession with the term Bollywood, a term which Wikipedia itself defines as an Informal. There is no place called Bollywood in India, unlike Hollywood in the U.S.

It is a mere informal reference to the Mumbai based Film Industry of Indian Cinema.

  • Most importantly, each and every sentence in his article is verifiable, it does not violate any copyright. Unlike your vague ideas.
  • Lastly, you've had a fortunate run on Wikipedia so far, You can't even spell things right, you need to learn the language first before running down and Vandalising articles.

One look, at your user page and your replies, your spelling mistakes glare at the readers face.

Even while stating your claims here, you have misspelt the word Alcohol.

  • Work on it and stay away from vandalising Salman Khan's article.

--LuckyS 18:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)LuckyS[reply]


LuckyS, please note that referring to another editor's good-faith edits as vandalism is a personal attack, and as such is prohibited by Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:No personal attacks, and also the warning I've put on your Talk page. KarlBunker 15:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion[edit]

User:Plumcouch requested a third opinion about this edit, which User:LuckyS reverted as "Vandalism of the Highest Order." That is quite an exaggeration, IMO. LuckyS needs to be more cooperative with other editors and tone down the rhetoric. The objectionable part seems to be this change:

Old New
Khan ... remains one of the most successful movie stars in Indian Cinema. (The Mumbai based Hindi/Urdu language film industry, popularly known as Bollywood). Khan ... remains one of the most successful movie stars in one of the regional Indian movie industries called Bollywood.

I am not qualified to judge the accuracy of what is called Bollywood, but the new version certainly has better grammar and punctuation. LuckyS also said that rediff.com is a spam/hate site, but on (relatively cursory) examination, I found no evidence of that. It looks to me like a news site with standard "celebrity gossip" pages. LuckyS will need to provide some evidence of that not being a reliable source for it to be discredited.

Additionally, Plumcouch converted the inline footnotes to reference-style footnotes (see WP:FN). While I agree that this latter style is superior, Wikipedia:Citing_sources#How_and_where_to_cite_sources clearly says that an editor should not change the footnote style without consensus. I think if you ask here, Plumcouch, you won't meet much resistance on this count. (PS, I also moved some of the lengthy talk to an archive page. Feel free to move it back if any of those discussions are still active.) --Flex 02:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


~Celebrity gossip can never be a part of encyclopedic content

Instead, Plumcouch will have to provide creditable proof of all the allegations levelled in the Rediff article.

-The objectionable part is not just that change.

If you have no idea, what Bollywood is, you cannot contradict someone who knows what it stands for.

Besides Plumcouch himself had changed the footnote without concensus, you cannot blame other editors alone.--LuckyS 17:43, 21 October 2006 (UTC)LuckyS[reply]

About the footnote:
User:Mardus added these kind of references back in June 2006,[2] and neither I nor Zora, Slytime, Danianjan, Pa7 or any other editor had a problem with them. As for Bollywood and what it stands for: I think this belongs into the corresponding article Bollywood, given it is verifiable and not POV.
While I agree that gossip should never be included in articles, Rediff has been a reliable source in the past. Changed the link however to TimesOfIndia.com, if this one suits better. As for the creditable proof: I provided them, Lucky deleted them and linked Katrina Kaif's article. I think Ouroborusing isn't useful.

Best regards, --Plumcouch Talk2Me 18:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~User plumcouch had himself linked the TimesOfIndia article Badboys in lieu of the Rediff article and himself asked user LuckyS to change it with a better article which is credible,(-- Lucky, if you're not happy with the link provide a new one - for further discussion, also see Khan's talk page). Thats exactly what I did, The badboys article of Times of India's website was another halfbaked gossip news item, which is what user Plumcouch seems to prefer. He was the one to link the controversial Rediff article, then one second thought, changed it with the Badboys article on the pretext of proving just one point, a mention of actor Salman Khan's present and ex-girlfriends which were mentioned in just two lines, the rest of those articles contained slanderous allegations, deemed as facts by User Plumcouch. How fair is that, can user Plumcouch provide verifiable facts over all those allegations levelled in the articles? If not, then what else would qualify as the Highest form of biased Vandalism by an old user? Incase user plumcouch hadn't noticed, the fact that actors Salman Khan and Katrina Kaif are dating was even mentioned in Kartina Kaif article other than verifiable links provided, besides user pc was the one to ask for [citation needed]. The user seems to personally dislike the subject and is using his powers to manipulate the situation. --LuckyS 19:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)LuckyS[reply]

Rewrote article[edit]

I removed the fangush and added references to some of the past scandals. The language in the article is extremely sober and non-slanderous and readers can draw their own conclusions if they click to the original articles -- for instance, if they don't think the news source is sound. None of the sources are blogs -- they're all published newspapers. This article should not cover up Salman's past problems (though it shouldn't exaggerate them either, and I think the way that it is written now doesn't exaggerate). Zora 02:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Different POVs[edit]

Lucky, the basic Wikipedia principle is NPOV. Neutral point of view. If there's a controversy about something, we don't take sides. We just detail what each side of the controversy says, and let readers make up their own minds. You are trying to censor the article and remove links to newspaper articles that say things you don't want people to read. If you are so sure that those articles are wrong, then trust the readers to see through them. If there is an article (published by a reputable newspaper, magazine, or website) that gives your side of things (Salman is being persecuted), then find it and we can link to that too. You can't just declare your POV right and exclude all others. Zora 22:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons for deleting Relationship troubles[edit]

I deleted segment called Relationship troubles because under the Policies for Biographies of Living Persons, it specifically states that "Biographies of living people must be written conservatively and with due regard to the subject's privacy. In case of doubt, the rule of thumb should be "do no harm". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid. It is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives.", and this was clearly the case here.

The circumstances regarding the Rai's incident seem questionable. There is no official information, the incident is not documented by reliable third-party sources, and the charges were dropped, so it is impossible to uphold NPOV (by copying information from tabloids). This article should in general abstain from making judgments about Mr. Khan's personal (love life). I use as precedent David Copperfield article where the whole Claudia Schiffer section (their relationship controversies) was deleted and brought down to one factual sentence, "Copperfield was engaged to the supermodel Claudia Schiffer, but the couple parted ways in 1999 after a six year relationship." Much like, "Despite tumultuous relationships with ex-girlfriends Aishwarya Rai the sexy babe, Somy Ali and Sangeeta Bijlani, he is regarded as Bollywood's most eligible bachelor. Currently said to be dating Katrina Kaif." Anything more really feels like tabloid exploitation rather than encyclopedic material.

In "the audio tape scandal" he was vindicated. Meaning he had nothing to do with it, therefore it is not important. Even referencing to it implies that he had (most people will overlook the "it's a fake" bit, and remember the gritty details) and amounts to defamation. Nandana23 10:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd crop the "said to be dating" part. "Said to be" sounds like gossip and WP has regulations for that. --Plumcouch Talk2Me 22:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mm yeh you're right Plum. Wikipedia has to be based on pure facts, --Shahid • Talk2me 22:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated peer review[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Shahid • Talk2me 23:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why Superstar term not used for Salman when he is one???[edit]

Why Salman is not referred as a Superstar when the whole of India knows that Salman is one of the biggest superstar of the Indian Film Industry.This has been proved when the newspaper,magazines,journalists and other medium has always referred to him as Superstar.This has been proved by his astounding success and his very unique and successful run at the box office.The things which support this is the magazines,articles,Journals and news channels and the film industry people who have always referred to him as superstar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidds83 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I am sorry I thought I was reading wikipedia and not watching WWE. Superstar is a media manufactured term. It has no factual basis whatsoever. Is there any mathematical or scientific definition for "superstar"? Do you have to earn a certain amount of money at the box office before you call be called one? NO. The definition of "superstar" by us Indians is this:- "when hero or heroine reign over hearts of many people he is superstar." In short "superstar" is NOT a term, that's why Salman is not referred to as one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.225.131 (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

== READ THIS IT IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE READ THIS ARTICLE AND ADD THE REFERENCE IT SAYS THAT SALMAN KHAN AND SAIF ALI KHAN ETC ARE muslim sunnies.

--99.229.145.116 (talk) 05:24, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THIS INFORMATION IFOUND IS VERY IMPORTANT READ IT AND THEN ADD IT TO THE ARTICLE OF SALMAN KHAN HERE IS THE WEBSITE http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1199609 21 OCTOBER 2008 (UTC). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.145.116 (talk)

Salman Khan made a new Script for his New Movie Veer[edit]

Salman Khan has made an script about war and historian. the period of time that the movie is going to shoot is 1820 to 1930. The movie is going to directed by Anil Sharma and expected to release in 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.108.54.8 (talk) 20:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 15 December 2012[edit]

188.248.88.81 (talk) 10:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please be specific of what needed to be changed? You can explain what you want done and reactivate the request by changing answered=yes to answered=no above. Torreslfchero (talk) 10:48, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 17 December 2012[edit]

In personal life of Salman Khan it is given that "Charges of culpable homicide were laid against him, but later dropped, and he was found not guilty.[82]". This is totaly untrue. If you go through the source mentioned even here also, it is given that the culpable homicide charge has been dropped. But he was not declared not guilty. The case is still going on. So it should be changed to "Charges of culpable homicide were laid against him, but later dropped, and he is right now being tried under lesser charges.[82]" Amitnigamz (talk) 11:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done: I have removed the "not guilty" portion per your request; however, the source does not say he is being tried on lesser charges right now. If you can provide such a source please provide it and reactivate this edit request. Thanks. —KuyaBriBriTalk 16:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies Section needs to be Updated for both Actors Shahrukh Khan and Salman Khan[edit]

http://thenewsdose.com/2008/07/26/shahrukh-and-salman-khan-fight/

Biggest spat between these two actors have been the HOT topic of over a year now and still Wikipedia has not updated the profile showing that...They need to update both Shahrukh Khan and Salman Khan Profiles

It appears you got your wish, and there is now a massive paragraph about this. However, is a pile of gossip about a "handbags at dawn" spat between two spoilt little rich boys really noteworthy, other than a passing mention? We certainly don't need details of who is alleged to have said what to whom, who had had so many drinks, and who was sat next to whom. This is an encyclopedia, not a gossip sheet. Skinsmoke (talk) 04:05, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 23 January 2013[edit]

117.223.21.121 (talk) 06:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC) king khan,tiger khan[reply]

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

article interface[edit]

Come on dude...change the Superstars display picture!(m sure their are more licensed Pic of bhai for his promotional purpose...use it ) And like u add shahrukh khan's event Pic in the sections..please do the same for bhai :) Add his nick name's dude; Sallu bhai, Dabangg Khan, king of blockbusters, blockbuster khan, blockbuster king and Man with a golden heart ! 

            Peace out :)
            cheer!!


Yes this article does need lot of editing, Salman Khan has become the most popular Bollywoood actor ever, he is the love of all indians, bet it a 2 year child of 60 year old person everyone is cvrazy about him. It sure needs a mention over here in the articles, add Dabangg Khan, Tiger Khan, Pure sould Bieng human Khan. Please mention how he has overshadowed all bollywood biggies like Amitabh and Sharukh. Its only Salman Khan now, the biggest star ever India has produced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.89.74 (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 9 February 2013[edit]

Salman Khan has starred in more than 80 Hindi films. Khan is now regarded as one of the greatest and most influential actors in the history of Indian cinema[3] following his movies' success after giving six consecutive blockbusters including Wanted, Dabangg, Ready, Bodyguard, Ek Tha Tiger and lately Dabangg 2. Shadab0007 (talk) 10:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please be more specific about what needs to be changed and provide reliable sources for your above statements. TBrandley (what's up) 16:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit salmans profile. He is the most adorable, magical ,sexiest living legend. Loved for his real life personality. Most popular star everi in the history of world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.89.74 (talk) 19:11, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - do you have any reliable source which states this? Torreslfchero (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Picture[edit]

I think it's time to get a new picture for this artcile. It would be great if someone could manage so.

salman mom is a maharashtrian please edit wiki page. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-12-09/bollywood/28265231_1_marathi-magic-salman-khan-chief-guest — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prshntsathe (talk • contribs) 08:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References
Wikipedia is not a fanbase. The information is already in the article, just needs to be accepted. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞

is it so? thn y this rule is nt applied for othr articles?? and ppl kindly add some more event pictures of him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infatuated.soul (talk • contribs) 18:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no move. -- tariqabjotu 03:28, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan → Salman Khan (actor) – I believe searches for "Salman Khan" should redirect to Salman Khan (disambiguation) and not to this article, as another person of the same name (Salman Khan (educator)) is just as notable -- he was recently names to the Time 100. —Eustress talk 06:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up, will do —Eustress talk 17:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:N, popularity and notability are not the same. I think the notability of Salman Khan (the actor) and Salman Khan (the educator) are both great enough to warrant the dab page as primary. —Eustress talk 21:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator withdraws request for move Per Tbhotch's point, article traffic over the past 90 days is 983k visits for the actor (current primary) and 117k visits for the educator (i.e., usage favors the actor); plus, the actor article was created in 2005, the educator article in 2010 (i.e., long-term significance favors actor too). Therefore, pursuant to Wikipedia:Dab#Is_there_a_primary_topic.3F, I now think things should stay as-is. —Eustress talk 21:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Tbhotch (with two editors still supporting, it wouldn't be right to close the discussion as withdrawn, but the nominator's opposition is duly noted). --BDD (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose don't need to look at Tbhotch's pageviews, everyone knows Salman Khan is a living deity in the world's largest English speaking country. The tutorials guy, I wish him luck but fails on WP:RECENT and WP:PAROCHIAL In ictu oculi (talk) 02:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Edit request[edit]

74.73.48.144 (talk) 17:31, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Per our policy about the biographies of living persons, I removed your unsourced information. You can provide the exact wording to be inserted, in a "please change X to Y" format, along with the reliable source. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This Page need extension, photos and updates[edit]

This page is about a Bollywood most popular, famous actor and celebrity. He is the most searched Indian celebrity on internet. This page need extension, photos and updates. Dr. Shahid Alam(Talk to Me) 08:17, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 May 2014[edit]

Salman Khan Has A Bigger Fan Following Than Shah Rukh Khan - UTVSTARS HD link-http://www.videosamachar.com/play/salman-khan-has-a-bigger-fan-following-than-shah-rukh-khan-utvstars-hd-utvgroup


NIKHIKL91 (talk) 09:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: I don't think the source really verifies anything about Khan's fan following. It is simply noting that Salman Khan has a significant following, possibly more than the other Khan. Furthermore, the source has questionable reliability. Also, it's not clear how you want editors to implement you change. In the future, please mention your specific requested changes in a "please change X to Y" form. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 21:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

g

== BADSHAH 2 LUNCH

File:Salman khan
The Superstar

==

The trailer of Salman Khan's much-awaited upcoming film "Kick" was released in the presence of fans at the popular Gaiety Galaxy cinema hall, Mumbai, on Sunday (15 June).

The trailer gives us a glimpse of what to expect from the film. Looking at the video, one can say that the film will be a complete action entertainer with all the commercial elements. Salman is sure to impress his fans once again in his stylish action avatar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.132.71 (talk) 18:05, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2014[edit]

70.76.63.214 (talk) 22:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. NiciVampireHeart 23:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 July 2014[edit]

pankaj sir 122.160.21.105 (talk) 08:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 09:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 August 2014[edit]

From 2.3, the last sentence should be changed to "Salman Khan's latest release, Kick, has entered the club of Rs. 100 crore in India on Eid." Not "Khan's 1st release of 2014, Kick has entered the club of Rs. 100 crore in India on Eid." 117.199.1.217 (talk) 15:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done as WP:DATED - assuming he makes another film, his "latest release" will change - his "first release in 2014" will always be the same. - Arjayay (talk) 11:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 September 2014[edit]


Sumit Kr Das (talk) 12:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC) |- | 2014 !scope="row"| Kick | Devilal Singh | Nominated—Filmfare Award for Best Actor |}[reply]

 Not done Please provide reliable source which says he is nominated. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:20, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Salman Khan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 01:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 01:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not GA at this time[edit]

Unfortunately, not GA at this time due to meeting quickfail criteria WP:WIAGA of sourcing issues:

Multiple instances of uncited material in WP:BLP page
  1. "Khan's stepmother is Helen, a former actress, who co-starred with him in a few films. He has two brothers, Arbaaz Khan who is married to Malaika Arora Khan who is an actress, VJ and host, and Sohail Khan who is married to Seema Sachdev and they have two sons: Nirvaan and Yohan sometimes also known as Aslam Yakub Khan(born June 2011), two sisters, Alvira who is married to actor/director Atul Agnihotri and Arpita, the youngest in the whole family."
  2. "Khan's work in 2006 included Jaan-E-Mann and Baabul, however neither of these films were successful in the box office."
  3. "Khan's first release of 2010 was Anil Sharma's commercially and critically unsuccessful film Veer."
  4. "Salman has recommended composers like Himesh Reshammiya and Sajid-Wajid. He supported Sanjay Leela Bhansali to make Khamoshi: The Musical and then Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam. Actor Govinda' s career was rescued by Khan as he offered parallel role in Partner. Similarly it was Salman Khan who suggested Mohnish Bahl to Sooraj Barjatya for Maine Pyar Kiya and later in Baaghi: A Rebel for Love after his stinct as hero failed. Bahl has also done important roles in Salman's Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!, Hum Saath-Saath Hain and recently Jai Ho. Similarly he was instrumental in getting Ravi Kishan, the role in Tere Naam."
  5. " Due to high TRP Salman Khan again hosted Bigg Boss 5 along with Sanjay Dutt in 2011 and because of huge acceptance also hosted Bigg Boss 6 and Bigg Boss 7 in 2012 and 2013 respectively. In 2013 Khan hosted the Star Guild Award for the first time."
  6. "Khan has been the subject of several controversies, including certain legal troubles."
  7. " On 24 July 2013, he was formally charged with culpable homicide in the case, to which he pleaded not guilty. The trial is scheduled to begin on 19 August.[clarification needed][113]" = tagged as clarification needed and unaddressed at time of GA Review

Please feel free to renominate once all oustanding unsourced WP:BLP issues have been addressed. — Cirt (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 November 2014[edit]

ImAkaz (talk) 08:44, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 09:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2014[edit]

94.96.64.185 (talk) 13:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | ethnicity = Pathan[reply]

Done –Davey2010 • (talk) 19:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

filmfare awards[edit]

Filmfare award for best actor in a leading role male = 0 Muhammad asif niazi (talk) 03:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2015 (Hit and Run case updated)[edit]

The hit and Run case Salman khan is now guilty in Hit and run case by court the details are here http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-32603596 Tasawart (talk) 06:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC) Tasawar Waris Producer Dunya Tv Islamabad[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Esquivalience t 18:40, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 May 2015[edit]

Nidareee (talk) 13:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done No request made. --NeilN talk to me 14:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi[edit]

Hi Sayedgilik (talk) 03:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blackbuck or Chinkara[edit]

This is quite confusing. The blackbuck is a different animal from the chinkara. Which one did Khan actually kill? And if unsure from the references, shouldn't the section header and the section text agree with each other? Currently, the header says Blackbuck, while the text says Chinkara aJCfreak yAk 16:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

==

assalamu alaikum I want to talk with you one time salman sir its my wish Ajimkhan (talk) 08:10, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2015[edit]

allow me to edit this page

thanx Apanoriya (talk) 07:59, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Cannolis (talk) 12:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2015[edit]

The years for the films Dabangg, Bodyguard and Dabangg 2 in the filmography section are wrong. 2A02:8108:30BF:B168:998D:A11D:FD4:5D4F (talk) 20:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for catching that. Cannolis (talk) 01:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Salman Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 November 2015[edit]

49.205.130.98 (talk) 11:05, 22 November 2015 (UTC) he belongs to only islam[reply]

 Not done The statement in the article has a reliable source, whereas yours does not - Arjayay (talk) 19:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 December 2015[edit]

14.96.245.182 (talk) 09:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)hi this is wrong[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. - a boat that can float! (happy holidays) 19:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Salman Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 32 external links on Salman Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hyy...[edit]

I No Sonwaneranjit (talk) 20:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bhaijan[edit]

Muslim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abubakar khanabubakarkhan (talk • contribs) 11:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Salman Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

salman khan[edit]

salman khan is rockstar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubhamgupta113 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply] 

this my favorite hero so please new move so please  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.254.237.43 (talk) 21:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am big fn of ur sr... 

Pawan Pandit123 (talk) 02:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Salman Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Salman Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Salman Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Salman Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fan of salman khan[edit]

Salman khan's greatest fan is Saddam Khan Samejo... SkSamejo (talk) 16:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 June 2016[edit]

Edit in the controversy section

Salman Khan: Actor Says Film Production Schedule Left Him Feeling Like a 'Raped Woman'

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-36583884?ocid=socialflow_facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=facebook http://motto.time.com/4377474/salman-khan-raped-woman-comment/?xid=time_socialflow_facebook

Sh4dy~enwiki (talk) 21:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 23:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2016[edit]

The Nominations – 1995 [dead link]. Fixed the dead link with Biography, Awards & Nominations

Yukobyte (talk) 11:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2016[edit]

45.115.106.151 (talk) 09:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: It is far out of scope of a edit request to create an article Cannolis (talk) 12:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 August 2016[edit]

Salman Khan is the undisputed king khan of bollywood and often called as the Dabangg Khan and Sultan of Bollywood.

Syangbodinesh4099 (talk) 16:03, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Not done that is just your personal point of view followed by some unsourced claims.
You have not cited independent reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article Arjayay (talk) 16:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan & Aishwarya Rai[edit]

It's important to discuss Salman's violent proclivities toward Aishwarya Rai. Read More Their relationship was sugarcoated and does not reflect the domestic violence and abuse he inflicted on her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimpz42 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rape Comment[edit]

Article should also include Salman's callous remark likening his Sultan wrestle training to rape. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimpz42 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

हेलो मेरा नाम नईम अहमद है मे आप का बहुत बड़ा फैन हूँ आपकी फिल्में बहुत शोक से देखता हूँ भाईजान मैं आपसे मिलना चाहता हूँ मेरा मोबाइल नंबर(7500187568)भाई मुझे फोन करे अपना भाई समझ कर — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:210A:5089:2CB7:FCEC:7607:4226 (talk) 11:28, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2016[edit]

 Not done we do not include spam/copyvio sites - Arjayay (talk) 10:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2016[edit]

"Khan has received numerous awards, including two National Film Awards, and two Filmfare Awards"

This is wrong information, It appears to indicate that Salman Khan has won a national film award for his performance in a movie, but in actuality the two movies he produced bajrangi Bhaijaan and Chillar party won those awards. The link by wikipedia proves my statement. Please clearly indicate that the movies he produced won the award https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Salman_Khan#National_Film_Awards Ahmedmohammed6 (talk) 00:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Bollyjeff | talk 03:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2016[edit]

"Described by the CNN as one of the world's biggest stars"

CNN, Fareed Zakaria, GPS named him Shahrukh Khan the biggest star

http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2016/02/22/exp-gps-0221-srk-interview.cnn Ahmedmohammed6 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

trash Redundant This is an article about Salman Khan. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 05:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Salman Khan and Aishwarya[edit]

They were very close long time ago.. But now ash is wife of Abhishek Bachchan and Salman Khan is single.. Noor Kamil (talk) 18:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is already covered in the article. Is anything needed to change? Bollyjeff | talk 19:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trigeminal neuralgia[edit]

It is not suicide disease. This Content is misleading. You should remove this sentence-"it is disorder of facial nerve and known as suicide disease" Parixit malaviya (talk) 17:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But according to sources on the condition's page, it is called that: "Harvey Cushing’s case series of trigeminal neuralgia at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a surgeon’s quest to advance the treatment of the ‘suicide disease’". Bollyjeff | talk 02:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

help me: Please insert Salman's full name[edit]

This is protcted article and I am unable to edit it. Can the next editor please place his full name in the lead, rephrase the lead text as following:
Abdul Rashid Salim Salman Khan, credited as Salman Khan
Use this,this this this this and this sources as references. Alternatively, use any other best-practice wikipedia convention guideline, if any, to include his name in the lead in bold default black color. Thanks in advance. 2404:E800:E61E:452:C186:128:EADF:EE9D (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It has that in the infobox, but the lead should stick with common name, per convention WP:COMMONNAME. Bollyjeff | talk 01:29, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'll also mention that none of the links you provided are sufficient as references, IP editor. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 September 2017[edit]

Could someone add "and" before Sultan in the second paragraph? 2602:306:BC31:4AA0:5EC:845C:8F98:F36E (talk) 15:40, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 15:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2017[edit]

please also add this ..."A entertainer" Prakash53 (talk) 16:49, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done It is not clear how "... film actor, producer, television personality, singer..." doesn't already include "entertainer". Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:03, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2017[edit]

112.196.62.4 (talk) 17:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: empty request Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Salman Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2017[edit]

Nadadaz (talk) 19:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, There's another picture which says Salman Khan in 2011, that's completly false, this was a fashion show for his brand being human in 2009, you can check the links down below,

https://www.google.com/search?q=salman+khan+fashion+show+2009&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiGtsCI14LYAhUMPRQKHVTABpMQ_AUICigB&biw=1280&bih=620#imgrc=Z8Fe-idU2KnHxM:

https://www.google.com/search?q=salman+khan+fashion+show+2009&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiGtsCI14LYAhUMPRQKHVTABpMQ_AUICigB&biw=1280&bih=620#imgrc=XIDN0s68PBNi_M: --Nadadaz (talk) 19:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)https://www.google.com/search?q=salman+khan+fashion+show+2009&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiGtsCI14LYAhUMPRQKHVTABpMQ_AUICigB&biw=1280&bih=620#imgdii=dCnaj8XJwbqr1M:&imgrc=XIDN0s68PBNi_M:[reply]

Done Fixed. Thanks for the correction. NeilN talk to me 19:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2017[edit]

Good evening,

I think that the page has everything, it is good written , but there's one thing that i would request is to change the main picture into a recent one, because this one was in 2007, and it is confusing to enter the page and see an old picture , especially if someone doesn't know the actor. I hope you will take my request into consideration.

Nada.

Nadadaz (talk) 18:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nadadaz:  Not done. The caption on our photo says it was taken at an awards ceremony that took place in July of this year. And I don't think that's a mistake; I looked up a few photos of Khan from 2007 and he definitely looks several years older in our photo than he did back then. CityOfSilver 18:46, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@CityOfSilver: Please see below. --NeilN talk to me 19:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2017[edit]

Nadadaz (talk) 19:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i didn't knew how to reactivate my request, but i am a big fan of Salman Khan since childhood and i know that the main picture is 10years old , and i got some sources which i'll let down below, and i will also send you the link of the picture which has the reference that you told me, iifa 2017

https://www.google.com/search?biw=1280&bih=620&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=U9cuWp2FHcr0UtigvtAI&q=salman+khan+jaaneman+party+launch+akshay&oq=salman+khan+jaaneman+party+launch+akshay&gs_l=psy-ab.3...3320.4310.0.4551.7.7.0.0.0.0.222.222.2-1.1.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..6.0.0....0.-9Rl__GK6zk#imgrc=M3kJkY3AE4WlrM:

and this the picture of iifa

https://www.google.com/search?q=salman+khan+iifa+2017&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwirhJ370oLYAhWJvhQKHd38Bs4Q_AUICigB&biw=1280&bih=669#imgrc=hAJtq0EPp54OOM:

I request you to take a look, thank you

Done Replaced photo with one from 2016. The old photo was uploaded in 2008 so unless there's some time travel involved... NeilN talk to me 19:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Nadadaz and NeilN: I actually bet he did travel through time. The only other explanation is that I made a mistake and that's awfully unlikely. CityOfSilver 19:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@CityOfSilver: Yes, much more likely that Einstein fellow was wrong. --NeilN talk to me 20:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2017[edit]

Nadadaz (talk) 16:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello

On Salman Khan's personal life, why it is not mentioned that he is actually dating the romanian girl Iulia Vantur, there are a lots of reports which are confirming this relationship, and pictures when she is with him all the time and at home also, i think that it's need to be there. And i know that you are going to say that he hasn't confirmed it technically, but he has never confirmed any of his relationships, like when he was with Katrina he has never really said it out loud but people knew it. Thank you

Nada.

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. NeilN talk to me 16:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Nadadaz: Please read WP:BLP: "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source." and "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives..." In short, we are not a gossip magazine nor do we use gossip magazines as sources. --NeilN talk to me 16:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/salman-khan-girlfriend-iulia-vantur-tubelight/1/983848.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadadaz (talk • contribs) 16:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much the definition of gossip and speculation. --NeilN talk to me 16:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2017[edit]

Salman's upcoming movie Bharat in 2019 is based on the Korean movie An Ode To My Father. Posty1978 (talk) 08:57, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to describe what kind of change you want to be made. Raymond3023 (talk) 09:00, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 December 2017[edit]

117.240.126.250 (talk) 10:53, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You need to describe what kind of change you want to be made. Raymond3023 (talk) 10:56, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unmarid[edit]

Marid Rezaul786karim (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rezaul786karim: Huh? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2018[edit]

14.139.204.219 (talk) 14:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

mention height of slman khan is wrong.

I do not see height in there, but it should not be there anyway. It is irrelevant for actors. Bollyjeff | talk 14:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe he's complaining about the Google search result he got and thinks Wikipedia is responsible? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2018[edit]

Raheem 74.108.79.239 (talk) 23:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2018[edit]

Change the image of Salman khan.Put a new one. http://bollyworm.com/news/tiger-zinda-hai-salman-khan-fans-go-bonkers/ 197.227.87.228 (talk) 12:56, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: This is not how Wikipedia works. To add an article to a Wikipedia page, you need to have a registered account and then upload it to Wikimedia Commons and then write [[File:You file here.jpg|thumb|Your caption here]] on the code on the Wikipedia page. Besides many images found on the internet a copyrighted, and cannot be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:02, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 August 2018[edit]

Nationne (talk) 12:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 14:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 August 2018[edit]

Salman khan died today(22-08-2018)


}} Rehan Khan 900 (talk) 13:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2018[edit]

Sush20202 (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 20:18, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2018[edit]

Please add the following vital/additional information: In early 2018, Google named Salman Khan the 'Worst Actor in Bollywood'(albeit for a short amount of time) which received tons of positive feedback from twitter users across the world. SOURCE: https://indianexpress.com/article/trending/trending-in-india/salman-khan-worst-bollywood-actor-google-twitter-reactions-5225305/ Shreyas1302 (talk) 18:40, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done It was a possible bug in Google. Moreover, this information is not needed. Had a renowned critic called him 'worst'actor', I would have added it. Comments from other users are welcomed though! Knightrises10 (talk) 18:48, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

filmography[edit]

ABCD 2 Rejamul sk 20:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rejamul sk (talk • contribs)

Hi Rejamul sk 21:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Height[edit]

5 foot 10 inches Rejamul sk 21:03, 18 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rejamul sk (talk • contribs)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 October 2018[edit]

Wrong Website www.salmankhan.com this is not salman khan website 122.177.135.16 (talk) 09:41, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. If this isn't Salman Khan's website could you provide the link to the official website to replace it. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 14:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Inshallah (2020 film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 May 2019[edit]

AhsanKhan10 (talk) 13:57, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Tolly4bolly 14:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing and reliability improvements[edit]

Hello Wikipedians, I see this article was nominated for GA status but turned down because of issues with unsourced or improperly sourced content. I'm doing a run through to see what I can do to help. As I work, I'll keep my notes updated.

Sourcing/Citation issues[edit]

  • This source is used to support a claim that Salman Kahn "has a significant following in Asia and the Indian diaspora worldwide, and is cited in the media as one of the most commercially successful actors of both world and Indian cinema."[1]
  • This source is used to support a claim that Khan is the only actor to star in the highest-grossing Bollywood films of ten separate years.[2]
  1. This source is also used to support the claim of Khan being the only actor to star in the highest-grossing BFilms of ten years.Notice that the article actually says, verbatim, "This does not make him the only actor who has the record of having maximum films in the Rs. 100 crore club, but it's also more than Shah Rukh Khan's films since he has just six 100-crore club films to his name." [3]
  1. This source as well was used, but it's broken.[4]
  1. This source was also used, but there's nothing to tie it together. Overall the claim looks like original research, so it is being removed.[5]

I'll keep working through it and also attending to the feedback left by the GA article reviewer. Curdigirl (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The article is littered with claims of box office success and failures, with this or that film being a "flop" or a "hit." Coming from the Indian Cinema task force, this is a common problem in articles related to Indian cinema. We want reliable, well sourced information, but not weasel words or peacock terms. Let's let the articles shine on their own right rather than fluffing them up with information that isn't actually pertinent, or inflated. I'm wary of including all the financial information that is claimed, for reasons better explained on Wikipedia:Indian cinema task force

Claim: Tere Naam is to date considered Salman Khan's best film with a critically acclaimed performance.[6]

The provided source does not support the claim. It appears to be an interview with Director Satish Kaushik. Kaushik was asked "How would you rate Salman's performance in the film?" He responded by saying "Salman has given a great performance in the film. He's given an intense, unconventional performance. I believe this is the best performance of Salman's career so far."

So instead of saying that this is a critically acclaimed performance, I'll update this to simply include the quote and note that this is the opinion of the director. It's one thing to acknowledge that and quite a different thing to say it is critically acclaimed - the director is the director, not the public or the critics. Curdigirl (talk) 19:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This source was being used to support the claim that Tere Naam is considered his "best film with a critically acclaimed performance." The source doesn't make any sort of claim that it is his -best- although it certainly says it is amongst his best work. It can still be used for something, I'm sure, but no longer fits since the sentence itself has been changed to more accurately reflect sourced content, and remove synthesis of various sources.[7] See Wikipedia:No original research#synthesis Curdigirl (talk) 20:09, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Example farms[edit]

One thing I've noticed as common across Indian cinema related articles is the proliferation of examples. What I've noticed is that like this article, many of them go beyond listing the filmography in a nice neat fashion, or having a dedicated filmography page to drill down into individual films. While this can be helpful to a point, it's hard to read articles that list every single film and provide financial, critical, ratings info...again for every.single.film. It's actually painful to read. I don't know enough about which films are considered MOST impactful of his, but I do know that the article can be improved by winnowing examples which are not as strong or significant. I've flagged the career section as having indiscriminate examples for this reason. Curdigirl (talk) 20:18, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "rediff.com: Readers' Picks: Top Bollywood Actors". specials.rediff.com. Retrieved 2019-05-14.
  2. ^ "Salman Khan's Prem Ratan Dhan Payo Makes a 200 Cr Hat-Trick - NDTV Movies". NDTVMovies.com. Retrieved 2019-05-14.
  3. ^ "Sultan Is Salman's 10th Film To Enter The 100 Crore Club, While SRK Just Has Six!". indiatimes.com. 2016-07-10. Retrieved 2019-05-14.
  4. ^ https://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=2043&nCat=box_office_news. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  5. ^ "Boxofficeindia.com". web.archive.org. 2012-02-05. Retrieved 2019-05-14.
  6. ^ "'Tere Naam is Salman's best act' - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 2019-05-14.
  7. ^ "TOP 10: Salman Khan's biggest hits - Hindustan Times". web.archive.org. 2012-08-18. Retrieved 2019-05-14.

Semi-protected edit request on 3 July 2019[edit]

Salman Khan All Movies Hit Or Flop And Box Office Collection http://bollywoodfever.co.in/salman-khan-all-movies-hit-or-flop-and-box-office-collection/ 2001:420:5445:1300:ED3F:A6D6:D553:CD05 (talk) 23:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Ravensfire (talk) 00:00, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan's relations with Pakistan[edit]

please tell his paternal ancestors's relations with Pakistan and of Swat Valley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtbltwimtblttph (talk • contribs) 17:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As always @Mtbltwimtblttph: you need to provide published, independent sources if you want this information published in the article. Railfan23 (talk) 17:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan's Brother name[edit]

Salman Khan's Brother name wrongly written as Salman khan instead of Sohail khan Nihalmaner (talk) 00:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 07:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How come Salman Khan is Salman Khan's brother?[edit]

This page is protected so I couldn’t edit it. I think, in the listing of Salman Khan's relatives it was supposed to be Sohail Khan as his brother instead of being himself his brother. KaziDurjoy (talk) 07:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan's Brother name wrongly written as Salman khan instead of Sohail khan Nihalmaner (talk) 00:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Corrected.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 07:02, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2020[edit]

He is also 2405:204:A503:CC48:AD88:3A5:925B:C328 (talk) 08:01, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. TheImaCow (talk) 09:07, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2020[edit]

2009–present: Commercial success last 2 lines of this section (Just before Filmography section). Kick 2 didn't released in 2019 christmas. Please rectify the mistake. Source is, we are already in 2020 and 2019 has passed and we don't have a movie named Kick 2 . More related sources https://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/salman-khans-dabangg-3-may-release-on-christmas-2019-instead-of-kick-2-likely-to-clash-with-moghul-4891351.html and one more change in same line Bharat already got released in 2019, still last line is saying salman khan is shooting for Movie named Bharat in bay. Also please mention movie Dabangg 3. There is no mention of it. Kkajnabi (talk) 12:40, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 09:27, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salman khan Hariomkumarh6 (talk) 05:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 June 2020[edit]

please change Salman khan name with Salman Khan 


Salman khan Mohammad Haish (talk) 04:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salman khan Hariomkumarh6 (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done I have searched the article for mis-capitalisations, and cannot find any. If the error remains, please re-open this request and mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format (clearly specifying exactly where you wish the change to be made). Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 05:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 June 2020[edit]

The real height of Salman Khan is 1.65 m as mentioned by him frequently. Kindly edit the same from 1.74m to 1.65m. Thank you. Scrapnotebook (talk) 11:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Scrapnotebook (talk) 11:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done His height is not mentioned in the article from what I can see, nor should it be unless discussed by independent sources. --bonadea contributions talk 11:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you've looked at the Google results page and the "knowledge panel" they display there? They get some of their info from Wikipedia, but not all of it, and you'll have to contact them about changing the info they show. --bonadea contributions talk 09:05, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 July 2020[edit]

He is very bad man with no brain and has no skills to do anything he is very faltu actor he is an actress Ritvik99 (talk) 04:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Unsourced claims. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 04:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy[edit]

In 2018, Pooja Mishra accused Salman Khan and his brother Arbaaz Khan of rape. Constant runner (talk) 18:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Constant runner, any reliable, independent sources to support this potentially libellous claim? —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 18:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


https://www.filmibeat.com/television/news/2018/pooja-mishra-shocking-allegations-salman-khan-his-brothers-ra-ed-her-shatrughan-sinha-black-magic-278421.html Constant runner (talk) 18:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Constant runner, the Indian cinema task force does not consider its parent company, Oneindia.in, to be a reliable source. A small discussion over at the reliable sources noticeboard does not consider it to be reliable either. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 18:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But why it is added in pooja misrra's page Constant runner (talk) 18:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff exists. It's very likely it will get deleted. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 18:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thankyou Constant runner (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2020[edit]

  • 1. Change ' Top-Paid 100 Celebrity Entertainers in world' to 'Top-Paid 100 Celebrity Entertainers in the world'.
  • 2. Change 'Khan was the highest ranked Indian' to 'Khan was the highest-ranked Indian'
  • 3. Change 'first nomination for a Best Actor' to 'first nomination for the Best Actor'
  • 4. Change ' His role of Karan' to ' His role as Karan'
  • 5. Change 'the show earned enough target ratings points' to 'the show earned enough target rating points'
  • 6. Change 'gave a rating of 2/5 and said "The' to 'gave a rating of 2/5 and said, "The'
  • 7. Change ' The film, grossing ₹1.84 billion (US$26 million) on its first week beat the previous record of PK.' to 'The film, grossing ₹1.84 billion (US$26 million) in its first week, beat the previous record of PK.'
  • 8. Change 'Meanwhile Kick 2 which was scheduled to release around Christmas 2019 had been delayed.' to 'Meanwhile, Kick 2, which was scheduled to release around Christmas 2019, had been delayed.' Shefalisri (talk) 11:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To editor Shefalisri: 1-6  Done; 7 and 8  Not done I don't think 7 and 8 need any modifications. If you think I made a mistake, please make a new request for those two changes. -ink&fables «talk» 14:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2021[edit]

Mohammed.Khandwala (talk) 23:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

plz allow me to edit Mohammed.Khandwala (talk) 23:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

allow me to edit Mohammed.Khandwala (talk) 23:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. Ravensfire (talk) 04:05, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 May 2021[edit]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ― Qwerfjkl  (please use {{reply to|Qwerfjkl}} on reply) 10:31, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

salman khan style

223.225.57.186 (talk) 09:47, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

salman khan is best to way out new new thing daily style fashion <a href="https://todaybuster.blogspot.com/?m=1">routine </a> this some information take out Wikipedia is best platform in <a href="https://todaybuster.blogspot.com/?m=1">today buster</a> life.

Intro page[edit]

Salman Khan has significant fan following across worldwide in indian diaspora. Muffazal 786 (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 August 2021[edit]

I want to changes few information about salman khan...I think intro page missing his starpower worldwide. Muffazal 786 (talk) 22:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 December 2021[edit]

In this Salman khan page there is one url which is ( https://www.freepressjournal.in/entertainment/despite-flops-salman-khan-is-the-richest-celeb-of-2018-with-net-worth-of-rs-253-crore/1409677 ) It is not opening and the correct url is ( https://www.freepressjournal.in/entertainment/despite-flops-salman-khan-is-the-richest-celeb-of-2018-with-net-worth-of-rs-253-crore ) So i want to make changes with broken url to this correct url. Thanks Digitalarunkumar (talk) 12:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 December 2021[edit]

he has a significant following in Asia and the Indian diaspora worldwide. He is cited in the media as one of the most popular, influential and commercially successful actors of Hindi cinema. Muffazal 786 (talk) 15:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add this on intro of salman khan Muffazal 786 (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done That's all included in the lead in more detail already. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2022[edit]

2402:3A80:1E78:F2E1:DCDF:A6C7:9C19:B4EB (talk) 13:14, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spouse = Never married

 Not done: — DaxServer (talk) 13:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2022 (2)[edit]

spouse =never married Partner (s)= No 2402:3A80:1E78:F2E1:DCDF:A6C7:9C19:B4EB (talk) 13:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: No need to populate those parameters. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Sher Khan (2012 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sher Khan (2012 film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 20 § Sher Khan (2012 film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris talk! 02:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salim Khan Sahab has never divorced his first wife[edit]

What kind of misinformation are you adding; Salim Khan Sahab has never divorced his first wife and is still married to her and his 2nd wife Helenji 2607:FEA8:4CE2:E200:188E:1EA5:4B49:FC02 (talk) 00:10, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changed. (CC) Tbhotch™ 00:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2023 (follower of Meher Baba ?)[edit]

Greetings, in the categories section there's "Followers of Meher Baba".

Problem is that I don't find a source justifying it.

If you do Google Search you come across a website that says he read Meher Baba in jail.

https://www.dnaindia.com/lifestyle/inner-spaces-here-s-what-salman-was-reading-in-jail-1119205

That's the only "credible" (not organization related directly to Meher Baba) that puts such connection (apart from this Wiki article itself), but reading a book doesn't mean you're a "follower", a formal member of an organiznation linked to the late Meher Baba.

So I think that this category should be taken out.

Thanks.

 Not done for now: It says that he "found solace" in the writings of Meher Baba, I would say that's enough for this categorization. I don't think one needs to be a "formal member of an organization" to be considered a follower. Actualcpscm (talk) 19:15, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings, Meher Baba has a lot of religious propositions to make one a "follower", including that he was "God incarnate". Salman Khan "finding solace", even if there's a credible source (but only one), is still too ambiguous for Salman Khan to be called a "follower" in my opinion (does he consider Meher Baba "God incarnate" ? And so on), so please do reconsider such categorization. Thank you.
 Done I've removed it for now, mainly because this is a WP:BOLP. I still think it would be fair to call him a follower, but I don't know much about this field, so it might be better to err on the side of caution.

On an unrelated note, please keep in mind that you should always sign your comments. It's easiest to use the reply function, as opposed to source editing directly, which I suppose you did for your reply. Actualcpscm (talk) 19:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Khan is onboarded as the brand ambassador of the leading casual skill gaming company Zupee.[edit]

Khan is onboarded as the brand ambassador of the leading casual skill gaming company Zupee. 49.249.153.150 (talk) 14:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2023[edit]

Section: Remarks about 26/11 attacks

1. Change "Khan also said that Pakistan was not to be blamed for it, and that the Indian security forces had failed." to "Khan also said that Pakistan was not to be blamed for it, and that the Indian security had failed." [removed the word forces]. He has been misquoted.[1] Or preferably change the quote to active voice in accordance with Wikipedia Manual of Style[2]

2. Replacement of references 228 and 229. Reference 228 is the same article as reference as 230, but since it is not archived, it does not open, hence it should be replaced with reference 230 in all citations. Reference 229 has had its link changed, this is the new link:

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/media/entertainment/salman-khan-causes-uproar-with-26/11-comment-apologises/articleshow/6542044.cms

3. Addition of Express TV interview as a reference. Since the interview was televised, there must be an archived version of it somewhere. If not, I suggest the addition of the previous source [3] (cropped around his statement if possible) to give an exact clip of the statement made. Wikiuser459 (talk) 06:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done: That MOS page is defunct, and you seem to have posted the wrong link. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 18:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please add/correct the publishing dates of the articles as well. Thanks. Wikiuser459 (talk) 11:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "News 24 Clip of Salman Khan Express TV interview". Youtube. Leisure Cave.
  2. ^ "Wikipedia".
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Salman_Khan/Archive_2&oldid=1204232991"