Talk:Same-sex marriage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Former featured articleSame-sex marriage is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Article milestones
June 24, 2003Featured article candidatePromoted
March 1, 2004Featured article reviewDemoted
November 21, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former featured article

Under consideration[edit]

Adding this comment cuz some anon claimed it violated CRYSTAL. These are all countries where there is serious (and demonstrable) consideration by the govt or courts. Some will probably move up in the chart to TBA (e.g. Panama), whereas others are more likely to go the way of civil unions (e.g. Philippines) or even dismissal (as happened w Nepal). None (except probably Mexico) are a sure thing. But they're all countries with ongoing legal/political developments that are worth being aware of and keeping track of. — kwami (talk) 01:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Timeline? Definitely not a place for this. All this staff is included in national debates section. Ron 1987 (talk) 01:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
I wanted something a little easier to scan than that. Maybe at the top of that section. It does fit in the timeline in the sense of being currently under debate. — kwami (talk) 04:05, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
That's fine place. Ron 1987 (talk) 04:07, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

More editors who don't know what a "country" is[edit]

I see we're back to edits by people who don't know what a 'country' is, that somehow Denmark, the Faeroes and Greenland are countries, but that England, Wales and Scotland are not. One wants proof of what they could easily look up themself (the others don't comment at all), with threat of a block if this change to idiocy is not accepted. This was debated last year, and has been stable since. Do we really need to revisit it? — kwami (talk) 07:17, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Good points. Each should be judged on its own merits and laws, not its inclusion in the UK. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 02:15, 17 October 2018 (UTC)