This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of standardized, informative and easy-to-use resources about languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The infobox itself says, "No native script." As long as Sanskrit was a living language, its various compositions were either orally transmitted (1500 BCE to 500 BCE), or written in Brahmi script, Kharosthi or later the Nagari script, a precursor to the late-medieval and modern Devanagari script. If someone can write "Samskritam" in any of the first three above-mentioned scripts, fine. But writing it in the Devanagari is only slightly more authentic than writing it in the Persian script, for the first Sanskrit translations to Persian were done around the same time as the Devanagari began to establish itself as a stable script for transcribing works in a dead language. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 00:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
@Fowler&fowler: I have Brahmi keyboard and can upload Sanskrit written in Brahmi script. However, in Brahmi is it written as Sanskrit or Sanskritam ?Awaiting your reply. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 19:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Hmm. I didn't realize they had Brahmi keyboards. (I suppose they could be used for writing articles about old inscriptions.) The problem though might be bigger. In my limited knowledge, it is not clear that at the time that Brahmi may have been used for writing Sanskrit, that the nominalization (neut) saṃskṛtam was in existence or it was only used as an adjective saṃskṛtā or saṃskṛta (meaning pure, or improved, or refined) in combination with a noun which it was modifying. Also, it is not clear how it was pronounced then. Someone working in historical linguistics might have a clue. You could write either word with such a keyboard but we will need a reliable source saying that that is how it was written in those times. As far as I'm aware the Asokan edicts, which were written in the Brahmi script, were (at least in on the pillars) using a Prakrit language. I'm not sure that there are surviving ancient Sanskrit inscriptions in Brahmi, though there might be later ones in Sarada or Nagari (precursor to Devanagari). Sorry, I can't help any further, but writing the present-day pronunciation of the word "sanskrit" or "sanskritam" on such a typewriter is a fraught exercise despite Panini's supposed thoroughness. Sorry, I should have been more careful in choosing my words above. Now that I think of it, I meant "if someone can reliably write ...." Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks to the author(s) from the Tatar Wikipedia participants
Thank you, the author(s) of this article. We translated your article into the Tatar language.--A.Khamidullin (talk) 12:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
I have just modified 2 external links on Sanskrit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.