Talk:List of Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconUnited States: Military history Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

rough work[edit]

[1]

References

  1. ^ "US 'kept Guantanamo deal from UK'". BBC News. 2009-06-12. Archived from the original on 2009-06-13.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Afghan captives in Guantanamo which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 15:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Rahman Shalabi[edit]

A person such as yourself should not be accusing other editors of wikihounding, least of all me. In fact, you shouldn't be accusing anybody of anything. I've had this page on my watchlist for years. Anyone's heavy slashing of this article was bound to attract notice.

Perhaps you didn't notice the edit that you deleted also included a tag on your reference. At first glance, StarCityNews appears to have been designed with Wordpress blog software. There's no byline to check against the author's other writings. Those aren't disqualifying items on their own, of course, but it goes downhill from there. The item itself reeks of bias. The entire site smells like it's designed to attract attention so that they might sell BB-traded shares of itself to unwary investors.

This isn't to say that the text you added was wrong. It begins with "Shalabi said" -- which I know to be true. But we should be able to find other sources that quote him making up that claim.

As for why I broke it into a separate line, I did that because the first line is fact. The second line is for Shalabi's claims.
-- Randy2063 (talk) 17:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well your edit history of the past 48 hours e.g. Naser Jason Abdo where you jumped in on behalf of another editor indicates in my view that you are wikihounding me. This does not only concern this article here.
That Shalabi said that the procedure causes him extremely pains and he said that he feels like beeing treated like an animal is a fact and it does not make any sense to break up things that belong together.
I have removed StarCityNews and added more references. Why did you delete some of the new references and re-added StarCityNews? That does not really make sense. Could you please explain that. IQinn (talk) 23:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize you had fixed the reference. Your comment didn't mention it. I should have looked closer at those changes. I just moved it from the previous one (because I wanted to keep the exact tag you'd removed) without noticing that you actually fixed the source. I'm sorry for the error, but when you choose to make an obstinate nuisance of yourself, you need to learn to expect some degree of fluster in the reactions.
Again, I'm not wikihounding you. We've all been gravitating around the same general subject for a long time. If you looked closely at my edit history you might have noticed that I had worked on the Naser Jason Abdo incident within the Terrorism in the United States article. That was before the Naser Jason Abdo article was created.
As for this article, it says Shalabi said these things, but not that his claims are true. The first part is factual, and that's why I separated the two lines.
-- Randy2063 (talk) 04:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Again, there is no confusion about that in the text in it's current form. It clearly belongs together. IQinn (talk) 06:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

US Citizen needs to be highlighted[edit]

| 2002-04-05 || 9 || Yaser Esam Hamdi ||

  • US citizen. He was stripped of his US citizenship and deported to Saudi Arabia, where he spent his childhood, prior to the institution of the Combatant Status Review Tribunals in July 2004.[citation needed] This man was a US citizen, as is documented in his article. I think his case needs to be highlighted, rather than included in a list of Saudi citizens. Yes, he had lived in Saudi Arabia and grown up there as a child, but his status was important, leading to a US Supreme Court decision.Parkwells (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting linkectomy[edit]

Originally the table contained wikilinks to the individual captives, and wikilinks to their ID numbers. These ID numbers are essential to distinguish between these individuals, as most of them were identified by multiple names, and a large fraction of them shared a name with another captive.

Someone unlinked the numbers. That was a mistake. Even if the ID number is a redlink, one can still use the "what links here" feature to distinguish between captives with the same name.

So, please don't unlink those number. Geo Swan (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Humud Dakhil Humud Sa'id Al-((Jad'an" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Humud Dakhil Humud Sa'id Al-((Jad'an. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Humud Dakhil Humud Sa'id Al-((Jad'an until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Saudi_detainees_at_Guantanamo_Bay&oldid=1220404937"