From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Bibliographies / Science  (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the Science Taskforce (marked as Mid-importance).

Like a product brochure[edit]

This article reads like a product brochure.

Comparison with CiteSeer and Google Scholar[edit]

An anon editor has requested a comparison of Scirus with CiteSeer and Google Scholar be added. Nurg (talk) 06:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Physical contacting info.....???[edit]

-- (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

If it can be contacted via Elsevier, then the website should be co-logoed to maintain its integrity.

My opinion about the engine against Google scholar[edit]

The search criteria are better designed than Google scholar. However, the search mode is worse than Google scholar as the settings are always fliking back to default ones-- (talk) 06:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

In terms of the speed of eye's screening to the search results, the Google scholar is far better than this service-- (talk) 06:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)