Talk:Scott v Shepherd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Law (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Unanswered questions:

1) Why was the squib thrown in the first place?

2) Were there additional criminal charges against Scott? And if so what was their outcome? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.231.27 (talk) 07:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

"De Gray" or "De Grey"?[edit]

The majority held Shepherd was fully liable, because, said De Gray CJ, "I do not consider [the intermediaries] as free agents in the present case, but acting under a compulsive necessity for their own safety and self-preservation." - then later -

De Grey CJ's judgment was as follows....

203.9.151.254 (talk) 06:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)