Talk:Second Battle of İnönü

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



this page is not accurate, it clearly reflects a biased pro-greek point of view. even though the writer agrees the greek loss, he/she does not seem to admit that the greeks were never in an advantageous position

We also have to accept that there is a popular view which argues that such a battle didn't even occur or it was a mere clash of small groups, rather than an actual decesive battle, which was used as a propaganda material by the military officers, including İsmet İnönü himself, in order to escape from the strong opposition they were facing at the National Assembly sessions about the process of the newly formed Turkish military force. Deliogul (talk) 16:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

The dates also seem to be a problem. The battle was in Jan not in March and it was a very important turning point, regardless of the size of the fight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

My mistake. That was the First Inonu Battle.

Casualties part of Template[edit]

Is this part, more than (11th infantry division, 1st and 2nd cavalry division, 3 infantry regiments not included): supposed to be in the Casualties section of the template?? --Kansas Bear (talk) 07:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)