I proposed that this page be merged with Persian Gulf War, or it should just be deleted. It seems to say exactly the same thing as Persian Gulf War does, and can't decide if it wants to be a disam page or a fact page or what. If anyone has better ideas for cleaning this mess up, please do -- I usually try to save an AfD, if there is good reason, but I don't see one here. Thank you. Macduffman (talk) 21:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
I think deleting or redirecting this page would be a bad idea and I am glad to see that it was not done. -- PBS (talk) 13:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Well, per both WP:DAB (which I didn't cite) and WP:TWODABS, we're allowed to have some ambiguity. There's a LOT of results for a bird when you search for "Turkey" in Google, even in Google Books. But we have tolerance for ambiguity as long as there is a primary topic (see: Turkey), especially when you only have two possible meanings. RedSlash 09:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Oppose A complicated and potentially confusing issue, but as you rightly point out, where we have only 2 possible meanings it does not take much to decide that 1 is primary. I suggest that we adopt terminology for these wars which avoids terms like 1st, 2nd. PatGallacher (talk) 00:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Support per nom. This still sounds like the most logical proposal. --BDD (talk) 16:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Merge to Gulf War (disambiguation) and redirect there, per 220.127.116.11 and StAnselm. This seems the cleanest solution and avoids the ambiguity question altogether while also removing the need for hatnotes. — Amakuru (talk) 12:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.