Talk:SeeqPod

Bought by Microsoft

"The service is currently not operational, but a cryptic message on the Seeqpod homepage indicates that the company may have been bought by Microsoft." What is the cryptic message? Where is the citation? There is no explanation or reasonable way to evaluate the truthfulness of this statement. Until it can be reasonably ascertained I am going to remove this last bit of hearsay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.245.249.95 (talk) 06:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Bankruptcy?

Dudes, is this some kind of a April's fool, or is seeqpod really going under? Any verifiable sources? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.177.112.137 (talk) 19:42, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

"iPhone & iPod Touch"

this entry claims that seeqpod is the first iPod Touch/iPhone application to allow playable search results. This is patently untrue, as the YouTube application bundled with the iPhone allows the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.68.164 (talk) 00:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

YouTube does not allow playable search results in the same way that SeeqPod does. YouTube actually hosts the content that it plays. You search for content on the YouTube system and it plays from the YouTube system. SeeqPod searches the whole internet, and can then play music/video from those other sources. For instance, you can search for music videos (videos hosted on youtube) through SeeqPod, and these videos will play in your SeeqPod window. It means SeeqPod accesses data in a different way.BeebleBrox6 (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

"search verticals"

The term "search verticals" should be clarified; it is not immediately clear what it means, especially for people not familiar with those economic/business concepts. Benandorsqueaks (talk) 08:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Advertisement??

What's this about the page being written like an ad? I'm killing the tag off, if you want to readd it, please put something on the talk page.

Tsukasa K (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Mimvi

page says mimvi is in alpha and will be publically traded feb of 2010, it's a year later now. I'm an editor newbie, do we remove the old citation? 71.168.95.39 (talk) 23:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SeeqPod. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106081844/http://www.rdmag.com:80/Awards/RD-100-Awards/2008/09/2008-R-D-100-Award-Winners/ to http://www.rdmag.com/Awards/RD-100-Awards/2008/09/2008-R-D-100-Award-Winners/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)