Talk:Sega Genesis/GA1
GA Reassessment[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Tagged as in need of updating. Contains potentially dated statements from August 2005. Dead external links from May 2010 and March 2009. Unsourced statements from April 2008 and April 2009, Tom B (talk) 23:56, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Is it likely that any recent sales information is even out there to add? Tezero (talk) 15:28, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
still a lot of problems after one month, delisting Tom B (talk) 22:43, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- The one reverted change I noticed, (I double checked too) was possibly viewed as original research. However, all the rest of all your changes stuck. Alphaton also fixed more refs after you. I always hear things like "why isn't this article a featured article yet?" and now it's not a GA either...strange. I've slowly been fixing some of the refs here and there as well, as well as adding references to the few un-sourced statements in the article.--SexyKick 02:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
- Wait, so it goes from an A class, to a GA class, to a C class article in the space of a couple months???? How did we skip B class?--SexyKick 03:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
- I believe I've weeded out most of the problems. Apart from one Business Week source supposedly needing some kind of verification...I gave citations to everything that was marked as needing them, removed anything I couldn't find citations for, went ahead and did the same for many things that weren't marked with citation needed as well. Fixed the dead links - at least temporarily, with archived links. It's my fault for putting this off so long, I've had most of the articles I used for citations opened in Firefox tabs for a couple months now. Just had to get the motivation to fix them up I guess.--SexyKick 01:09, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Wait, so it goes from an A class, to a GA class, to a C class article in the space of a couple months???? How did we skip B class?--SexyKick 03:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
- The one reverted change I noticed, (I double checked too) was possibly viewed as original research. However, all the rest of all your changes stuck. Alphaton also fixed more refs after you. I always hear things like "why isn't this article a featured article yet?" and now it's not a GA either...strange. I've slowly been fixing some of the refs here and there as well, as well as adding references to the few un-sourced statements in the article.--SexyKick 02:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)