|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to . If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.|
|WikiProject Biography||(Rated Start-class)|
is this an article or a resume' ?
I share your sentiments. The scientific achievements really should be condensed. Besides, sentences like "Showing that processing sites in the visual brain are also perceptual sites" are vague (and inaccurate). Also, shouldn't there be references for all these claims? - Vpdath (talk) 20:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
A lot (lot lot lot) of Zeki's work has been roundly discredited by the scientific community. His work is no longer accepted as scientific. An encyclopedic entry about Zeki's career should be maybe 2-3 paragraphs, strictly factual, and leave out all this resume fluff. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 04:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)