Talk:Serio (rapper)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography / Musicians (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Removal of Deletion Tag[edit]

Cleaned up the page a little bit, and while I agree it doesn't appear he has any charting singles, etc., I still feel there's too high a possibility that he'll fit other Wikipedia:Notability (music) markers. So I feel deleting it for the proposed reason doesn't work. anyways, these are some of the criteria I suspect he may fit at least one of. My main, personal reason for not jumping all over the page is his work with other rappers that have Wikipedia entries. Makes me suspect that he may fit 7. Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. MusicLover650 (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC) That, or WP:Music guidelines 2, 5, 7, 10, and 11 may need looking into. MusicLover650 (talk) 01:13, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Removal of Copyright Violation Template[edit]

A new article has been written deleting copyright-infringing material. Information has been summarized from sources without plagiarism. Please use new edition Talk:Serio (rapper)/Temp in place of previous version. The following url is now in compliance with the Duplication Detector. Matches now found on the Duplication Detector are primarily proper nouns and articles (parts of speech). — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright Problem Resolved[edit]

Author has added to the original article that "re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0". The statement can be seen at the bottom of this page now Thank you for your assistance. Angelasong (talk) 13:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm glad that they've released the content. However, in order to import content from other websites that are compatibly licensed, proper credit must be given. Without the proper attribution, I'm afraid we remain in violation of copyright as our use is outside of the license. I have provided the necessary attribution on the page, but please review Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Sources under copyleft in case you encounter such a situation in the future. Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Removing redundant categories[edit]

Per Wikipedia:Categorization#Categorizing pages, "each categorized page should be placed in all of the most specific categories to which it logically belongs. This means that if a page belongs to a subcategory of C (or a subcategory of a subcategory of C, and so on) then it is not normally placed directly into C." With that in mind, I have removed six categories from this article as follows:

Please let me know if you have any concerns with this edit. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 22:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)