|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to . If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
There's one key thing this article doesn't mention - the fact that Stevens' music and image were completely out of step with contemporary British pop trends. He was a deliberately and sincerely retro throwback to the late 1950s, years after glam rock had mined the same seam, a kind of time-warp early Cliff Richard or Billy Fury. I was just a kid at the time so I can't really expand the article. I remember "Happy Days" being on the television a lot. He was a very unlikely success story in the New Romantic synth-pop age and it is doubly impressive that he is the leading British singles success of the 1980s. -Ashley Pomeroy 22:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Is there a Sunsets wikipage around, hidden somewhere? I can't find one. It seems (http://www.thesunsets.co.uk) they were around before him, and are still around now. They seem to be a little... under-represented. Groveller (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I already have this in hand, I will be talking to Dave 'Batman' Goddard in the next few few weeks to research The Sunsets history and references 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 03:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- The sunsets are hardly as important in the music world as Shaky. They may have been around before him, but that's not relevant. Isn't this the group that tried to sue him for a fortune after he became a millionaire because of "unpaid royalties" on records that sold very little. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
You simply have no idea. OMG comparing Shakin Stevens to Black Lace etc. Please do not comment on Shaky if you do not know what you are talking about. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 23:33, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I am not overly comfortable with the addition of the word surprising either, but in the context of the period you could hardly put Chaz n Dave and Black Lace in the same frame as Shaky. They had had limited chart success with a couple of novelty records whereas Shaky was one of the most successful chart acts of the day, indeed his record as the most successful UK chart act ever still stands. If not surprising, it is certainly odd that Stevens was not on the bill that day. 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 16:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Shakin' Stevens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120626104023/http://www.the-football-club.com/famous-football-fans.html to http://www.the-football-club.com/famous-football-fans.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.