From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Shanghai was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
December 9, 2010 Good article nominee Not listed


and not #Etymology and Names per WP:COMMON, WP:SCOPE, and WP:TERSE. There's nothing added by the longer name and needless eyesore and makework created for links. That said, the {{anchor}} links for #Etymology and #Name should be left for editors here and abroad linking to those. Also, at some point, the major alt and former names should be bolded, unless there's some strong consensus or reason against it. — LlywelynII 14:07, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 21 external links on Shanghai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Robert Jacquinot de Besange image[edit]

A hefty mention of Robert Jacquinot de Besange is warranted, but someone added a huge image of him to the history section. Is that really warranted now, taking so much space? We already talk about him and have his article linked, but his image and the large textbox accompanying it that pretty much replicates what's already written next to it just take up so much room. Mr. Magoo (talk) 06:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Well, I changed it to a shot of the Zhabei District burning in 1937. It's better to have glimpses of the situation of the actual city. Mr. Magoo (talk) 02:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

I also noticed that the Bloody Saturday (photograph) file in our article is of noticiably lower resolution than the one at the primary article for it. Although the one there doesn't have its borders cropped. Worthy of switching? Mr. Magoo (talk) 07:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Internal links removal[edit]

Recently, several IP users from Taiwan constantly reverted my edits that added some essential internal wiki links(e.g. Yu Garden, Nanjing Road) without a valid reason. These IPs are very likely to belong to the same person. -- (talk) 13:14, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Can you say something about City University, Cambodia?The broken from china.-- (talk) 13:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The talk page is where we discuss things relevant to this article. What you say is nonsense to me.-- (talk) 13:34, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
I only know that you use wikis as a lecture to promote big Chineseism, and from similar IP and account tracking you can find that you are happy to do these things, such as promoting nationalism or promoting nationalism. The specific approach is like an over-link or Avoid labels.-- (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
What you "only know" doesn't and cannot serve as a valid reason for your irrational and unexplained removal. Btw, I'm,not promoting nationalism and there is no term called "Chineseism". (talk) 13:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
You can see Liu Xiaobo. Your IP on there clam that he is a cheat.Don't you? And this page had over link.It is not necessary.-- (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Liu Xiaobo, man, he's kicked the bucket. How could I see him as a living being. Besides, these links are definitely not "overlinked" as similar city articles (NYC, Tokyo, Paris all have links in their infobox pic caption part. (talk) 14:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
If you can let me believe that is necessary.We can end this.Now I don't believe.-- (talk) 14:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Lol, just lol. You are hilarious. (talk) 14:11, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
I found that chinese like personal attacks.Is this a Chinese custom?Do not understand the idea of different races or foreigners.-- (talk) 14:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
You are oversensitive. Laughing at you isn't personal attacks. Btw, asserting all the Chinese to "like personal attacks" is "attacks" on the Chinese people as well, or simply racism. (talk) 14:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
So return to say that why you think those links are necessary.-- (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
First, this is English wikipedia whose readers may know little about China's cities. That is to see, locales like Yu Garden or Nanjing Road may be unfamiliar to readers which is also why internal wiki links exists to assist readers to better understand the context. In addition, these links I added don't occcur in the following couple sentences. (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Give me 10 minutes to read those links again.-- (talk) 14:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The Bind also needs to be linked according to your words.This time I think your words are right. Ended the event.-- (talk) 14:51, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

There doesn't seem to be anything wrong with those links. Don't know why they were originally unwanted by the other editor. Mr. Magoo (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)