Talk:Showdown (Cheers)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Showdown (Cheers) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
July 15, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Showdown (Cheers)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 15:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Issues:

  • Lede: Doesn't matter what time it aired at
  • Lede: Remove ref. it is suppose to summarize article, which should have ref.
  • Production: Add a "production" section, who are the "writers", "directors", etc.
  • Production: If it is created, "After this two-part season finale was filmed, NBC renewed Cheers for the second season, as announced on March 1983" would go in there
  • Ratings: 9:30pm should removed
    • Not done. It is necessary, regardless, for readers to know what time it aired. --George Ho (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Reception: The TV Guide → TV Guide

On hold. Main issues is to add production section. TBrandley 16:24, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

I added the non-free image with fair use. --George Ho (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Good Article??[edit]

I'm sorry, but how does this qualify as a good article? The English is atrocious and in spots almost unreadable! It sounds like it was written by a kid, or someone for whom English is a third language. It needs a lot of clean up before I would consider it to be a good article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.66.64.246 (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2012 (UTC)