Talk:Shrek 4-D

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Orlando's Version is Different[edit]

I wanted to know if someone could help me put up info about Orlando's version of this ride. In our version (I work there) we have a pre-show that has a "henchman" spiel for about 7 minutes, giving directions while being comedic. I am having a hard time trying to incorporate this into the article. Assistance with this would be greatly appreciated.--Farquaadhnchmn 16:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


When does Donkey spit? I have the dvd and he doesn't spit at all! Superjustinbros. 23:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shrek 4-D logo.png[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Shrek 4-D logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Mistake with the Pre-show[edit]

Not sure if Warner Bros and Movie Park have a different preshow from Universal Studios, but where I go to at USF, the pre-show starts with Gingy, Pinocchio and the Pigs complaining about being held prisoners, then they wake the Mirror who recites the previous events, culimnating in Farqaad's ghost appearing; however, the current pre-show section of the article states that Farqaad appears first, then orders the mirror to tell the story from the first movie. Should a correction be made?--Snowman Guy (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

I can only speak for Warner Bros. Movie World (WBMW) but I think your version sounds correct. The pre-show is on YouTube (refs are in the article), so that should be the telling point. Is USF's pre-show room like this at WBMW? If yes, then I think it is safe to assume all are like that. Themeparkgc  Talk  22:20, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Yes, USF's pre-show room has a similar look to WBMW.--Snowman Guy (talk) 22:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Merge with Donkey's Photo Finish?[edit]

Would there be any objections to me merging Donkey's Photo Finish into this article? Following that attraction's closure at USF, the article has become very confusing. Since it is tagged for being non-notable and unsourced, I figured a merge would be easier than cleaning up the article. Information could be added to a "spin-off attractions" section (or similar). Themeparkgc  Talk  07:11, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done Themeparkgc  Talk  00:35, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Test card parody[edit]

Was there an actual parody of Test Card F in one version of the attraction? That's what it says in the article. I can't find any, and parodies I found is one much close to the Indian Head test card. TheGGoose (talk) 15:58, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Shrek 4-D. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Kung Fu Panda[edit]

@, Mr. Mason, and Elisfkc: Gentlebeings, this is approaching the 3RR. Time to step back and evaluate. First, Mr. Mason and your alter ego, it would be very inadvisable for you to revert Elisfkc. The information you are trying to place shows no sources at all within it. Take the bit you're trying to post and edit it in your sandbox, adding inline references. When it is truly ready, then you can cut and paste it in. Make very sure your source is reliable because this is a future event you're posting, and we need to be vigilant. Elisfkc, you've shown remarkable restraint, let's continue to be nice to the new guy. If Mr. Mason does another revert he will go into timeout.

Mr. Mason, you need to publish the source you alluded to when you said: "(Undid revision 786830610 by Elisfkc (talk) Guess what I have found.)". — Myk Streja (who?) 05:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)