Talk:Sikh Rajputs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Sikhism    (Inactive)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sikhism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
 
WikiProject India (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 


Archive

Comment needed at Talk:Khatri[edit]

There is a dispute at on the page Khatri. KhatriNYC3 (talk · contribs) keeps reverting the article to a version which says:

"Khatri is the name given to Mair Rajputs, Sikh Rajputs and Muslim Rajputs"

The citations provided to support this statement (and some other statements) failed verification -- other editors checked the sources provided, but could not find any text which says that Mair/Sikh/Muslim Rajputs are Kshatriya.

The page has been protected now to prevent a revert war, and the current version of the page contains the above claim of Rajputs being Khatri in the intro.

If you are knowledgable about the topic Rajput, or have a source which proves/disproves the above claim, please help resolving the dispute at Talk:Khatri. utcursch | talk 06:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Sourcing[edit]

Statements in Wikipedia articles must usually be verifiable by reference to reliable sources. Lepel Griffin and his ilk from the British Raj era are not reliable. This has long been the consensus of the community across the entire spectrum of caste articles etc, so please do not introduce such sources to this article. Find something modern and, preferably, academic. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 03:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Aside from again removing Griffin, who was reintroduced to this article some time after 21 August 2016, I have had to revert to before that date because of this material in the lead. It makes no sense and is clear WP:PUFFERY. It Sikh Rajputs were Rajput princes who converted, who were the other (peasant etc) Sikhs who they allegedly protected? It is completely illogical, not least because not all Rajputs were princes. If you think that the sources really do say this then please provide a quotation from them. - Sitush (talk) 16:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit war[edit]

IP contributors keep adding this. The problem is, although it is phrased in a way that looks like it has been copy/pasted from somewhere, it does not appear to be in the cited sources. Please read WP:V. - Sitush (talk) 10:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)