Talk:Silver center cent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Silver center cent has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 2, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
June 15, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Numismatics (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject United States (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Passed[edit]

Short but seems to cover about everything notable; if possible, it'd be nice to see a little more history of the coins since 1793 (perhaps accounts of other sales at auctions, their increasing value over time)...but not necessary for GA quality. Chubbles 09:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Review: Pass[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Culture and Society" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. I tagged the image to be moved to Wikimedia Commons, so if you have an account, consider moving them. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

One resource is over-referenced here[edit]

This resource is mentioned many times in the article though it's not published by any highly acclaimed publishers. Perhaps these references be changed to a more reliable resource. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.172.131.169 (talk) 01:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC) It does seem so --JoshXF (talk) 07:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)