Talk:Simon Wiesenthal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Simon Wiesenthal has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
January 13, 2013 Good article nominee Listed

Third paragraph contains confusing sentence.[edit]

This sentence is in the third paragraph: "He later accused him of collaborating with the Nazis". I think it would be less jarring if these pronouns were replaced with the actual names involved. While the subsequent sentences make it clear who "he" and "him" are, why not fix the momentary confusion? Sluefoot (talk) 06:12, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Fixed. -- Diannaa (talk) 13:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
I think this whole paragraph needs to be reduced and the details moved from the Introduction section to the body somewhere. Far more words are devoted to this trivial knowledge than, say, how he survived three concentration camps and a death march. Mannydantyla (talk) 22:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
The material in the lead already appears in the body, as the lead is a summary of the contents. This is true for all Good Articles and Featured Articles as well as many other articles. See WP:LEAD for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:09, 16 August 2017 (UTC)